Bug#256770: Bug#204805: Intel have reproduced this 'bug'

To: Duraid Madina <duraid@octopus.com.au>, 204805-done@bugs.debian.org
Cc: GOTO Masanori <gotom@debian.or.jp>, 256770@bugs.debian.org, control@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug#256770: Bug#204805: Intel have reproduced this 'bug'
From: GOTO Masanori <gotom@debian.or.jp>
Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2004 18:32:58 +0900
Message-id: <[🔎] 81wu13ashh.wl@omega.webmasters.gr.jp>
Reply-to: GOTO Masanori <gotom@debian.or.jp>, 256770@bugs.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 40F8E862.7060109@octopus.com.au>
References: <3F37FF2B.8060305@octopus.com.au> <[🔎] 81acxzc9zz.wl@omega.webmasters.gr.jp> <[🔎] 40F8E862.7060109@octopus.com.au>

tags 256770 confirmed
thanks

Hi,

At Sat, 17 Jul 2004 18:50:42 +1000,
Duraid Madina wrote:
> 	#204805 is fixed now.

Thanks for your quick reply.  I close it now.

> #256770 is a new bug. But the problem may not be 
> with the Intel compiler. Why are symbols multiply defined in libc.a?? It 
> seems a mistake.

Yeah, that's right.  I confirmed there're a lot of multiple symbol
definition... I have no idea why duplicate symbols are existed.  It
needs investigation...

Regards,
-- gotom

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Processed: Re: Bug#204805: Intel have reproduced this 'bug'
  - From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System)

References:
- Bug#204805: Intel have reproduced this 'bug'
  - From: GOTO Masanori <gotom@debian.or.jp>
- Bug#204805: Intel have reproduced this 'bug'
  - From: Duraid Madina <duraid@octopus.com.au>

Prev by Date: Processed: Re: Bug#204805: Intel have reproduced this 'bug'
Next by Date: Bug#204805: marked as done (libc6.1-dev: new libc breaks intel C/C++ compiler)
Previous by thread: Bug#204805: Intel have reproduced this 'bug'
Next by thread: Processed: Re: Bug#204805: Intel have reproduced this 'bug'
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread