Bug#221360: marked as done (upgrade of libc6_2.3.2.ds1-10 hosed libc install)
Your message dated Sat, 17 Jul 2004 10:18:10 +0900
with message-id <81n01zctyl.wl@omega.webmasters.gr.jp>
and subject line Bug#221360: upgrade of libc6_2.3.2.ds1-10 hosed libc install
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Nov 2003 21:58:57 +0000
>From miekg@atoom.net Mon Nov 17 15:58:57 2003
Return-path: <miekg@atoom.net>
Received: from open.nlnetlabs.nl [213.154.224.1]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1ALrOa-0008AI-00; Mon, 17 Nov 2003 15:58:56 -0600
Received: from elektron.atoom.net (f52166.upc-f.chello.nl [80.56.52.166])
by open.nlnetlabs.nl (8.12.8p2/8.12.8) with ESMTP id hAHLwpGl077258
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Mon, 17 Nov 2003 22:58:51 +0100 (CET)
(envelope-from miekg@atoom.net)
Received: from elektron.atoom.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by elektron.atoom.net (8.12.10/8.12.10/Debian-5) with ESMTP id hAHLwold005123;
Mon, 17 Nov 2003 22:58:50 +0100
Received: (from miekg@localhost)
by elektron.atoom.net (8.12.10/8.12.10/Debian-5) id hAHLwoea005122;
Mon, 17 Nov 2003 22:58:50 +0100
Message-Id: <200311172158.hAHLwoea005122@elektron.atoom.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Miek Gieben <miekg@atoom.net>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: upgrade of libc6_2.3.2.ds1-10 hosed libc install
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.36
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 22:58:50 +0100
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_20,HAS_PACKAGE
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_15
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_15 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Package: libc6
Version: 2.3.2.ds1-10
Severity: normal
Hello,
I'm sending this bug report from my server, 'cause on my firewall
I can not install reportbug, because of the hosed libc install.
I just tried to do a apt-get dist-upgrade to the latest Sarge, and
somehow the libc went wrong (i don't have the exact details where things
went wrong). However i'm now left with:
root@kasteel# dpkg --install /var/cache/apt/archives/libc6_2.3.2.ds1-10_i386.deb
(Reading database ... 14199 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to replace libc6 2.3.2-9 (using .../libc6_2.3.2.ds1-10_i386.deb) ...
These libraries were found in /usr/lib:
libc.so.6
libdl.so.2
libm.so.6
libpthread.so.0
librt.so.1
A copy of glibc was found in an unexpected directory.
It is not safe to upgrade the C library in this situation;
please remove that copy of the C library and try again.
dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libc6_2.3.2.ds1-10_i386.deb (--install):
subprocess pre-installation script returned error exit status 1
Errors were encountered while processing:
/var/cache/apt/archives/libc6_2.3.2.ds1-10_i386.deb
And I have no glue what to do next. I've copied the /lib/tls directory over from
my server, but I'm hesitating to delete the libraries in question.
grtz Miek
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux elektron 2.6.0-test9-mm2 #25 Thu Nov 6 20:13:13 CET 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=en_IE@euro, LC_CTYPE=en_IE@euro
Versions of packages libc6 depends on:
ii libdb1-compat 2.1.3-7 The Berkeley database routines [gl
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 221360-done) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Jul 2004 01:18:11 +0000
>From gotom@debian.or.jp Fri Jul 16 18:18:11 2004
Return-path: <gotom@debian.or.jp>
Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (webmasters.gr.jp) [218.44.239.78]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Bldq7-0005i0-00; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 18:18:11 -0700
Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by webmasters.gr.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 975BBDEB80; Sat, 17 Jul 2004 10:18:10 +0900 (JST)
Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2004 10:18:10 +0900
Message-ID: <81n01zctyl.wl@omega.webmasters.gr.jp>
From: GOTO Masanori <gotom@debian.or.jp>
To: Miek Gieben <miekg@atoom.net>, 221360-done@bugs.debian.org
Cc: Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@debian.org>
Subject: Re: Bug#221360: upgrade of libc6_2.3.2.ds1-10 hosed libc install
In-Reply-To: <20031117225326.GA5897@atoom.net>
References: <200311172158.hAHLwoea005122@elektron.atoom.net>
<20031117221944.GA10062@nevyn.them.org>
<20031117224049.GA5715@atoom.net>
<20031117224616.GA10749@nevyn.them.org>
<20031117225326.GA5897@atoom.net>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.9.9 (Unchained Melody) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya)
FLIM/1.14.3 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Unebigory=F2mae?=) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.2
(i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: 221360-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
At Mon, 17 Nov 2003 23:53:26 +0100,
Miek Gieben wrote:
> [On 17 Nov, @23:46, Daniel wrote in "Re: Bug#221360: upgrade of lib ..."]
> > > root@kasteel# dpkg -S /usr/lib/libc-2.3.2.so
> > > dpkg: /usr/lib/libc-2.3.2.so not found.
> > >
> > > strange indeed....
> >
> > No idea what might have happened on Sep 12th to create that binary?
>
> i'm really guessing here, but an upgrade from Woody to Sarge might
> (_might_) have happened then. Otherwise I don't know. Nothing really
> weird is being done with that system, it just sits there being a
> firewall.
I guess some other program or your past operation makes
/usr/lib/libc-* files. I think this bug can be fixed, I close it. If
you still have question about it, please let me know.
Regards,
-- gootm
Reply to: