Bug#221850: marked as done (libc6: resolving broken since ds1-10)
Your message dated Thu, 1 Jul 2004 11:52:05 +0300 (EEST)
with message-id <Pine.LNX.4.21.0407011151160.17602-100000@hal.pp.fishpool.fi>
and subject line Bug#221850: libc6: resolving broken since ds1-10
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Nov 2003 12:27:38 +0000
>From q-funk@pp.fishpool.fi Thu Nov 20 06:27:37 2003
Return-path: <q-funk@pp.fishpool.fi>
Received: from smtp2.pp.htv.fi [213.243.153.14]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AMnuL-0006FT-00; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 06:27:37 -0600
Received: from posti.pp.htv.fi (posti.pp.htv.fi [212.90.64.50])
by smtp2.pp.htv.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 0402C296C08; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 14:27:37 +0200 (EET)
Received: from route.intranet (funkyware.pp.htv.fi [62.78.135.115])
by posti.pp.htv.fi (8.11.1 (Revision 1.5+JAGae91741+JAGae92668) /8.11.1) with ESMTP id hAKCRau10939;
Thu, 20 Nov 2003 14:27:36 +0200 (EET)
Received: from omena.intranet ([172.16.1.14] ident=q-funk)
by route.intranet with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1AMnuI-000526-00; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 14:27:34 +0200
Received: by omena.intranet (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 20 Nov 2003 14:27:33 +0200
From: "Martin-Éric Racine" <q-funk@pp.fishpool.fi>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: libc6: resolving broken since ds1-10
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.36
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 14:27:32 +0200
Message-Id: <E1AMnuI-000526-00@route.intranet>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_20,HAS_PACKAGE
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_20
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_20 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Package: libc6
Version: 2.3.2.ds1-10
Severity: important
Several applications which depend either upon /etc/hosts or upon proper resolving of filesystem paths accross a
connection have started failing, since a few days:
1) The stanza 'scp /path/to/file remote:/path/to/' no longer works.
2) NFS mounting from 'remote:/path' no longer works; I end up having to specify 'remote.domain:/path'.
3) Hotway (the Hotmail-to-POP3 gateway) no longer succeeds in fetching mail.
All those things used to work just fine, until about last weekend. They no longer do.
Since resolving is largely dependant upon libc6, I have to conclude that the sliding of 2.3.2.ds1-10 into testing is
what causes those failures.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: powerpc
Kernel: Linux omena 2.4.22-ben2 #1 ti syyskuun 23. 21:23:03 EEST 2003 ppc
Locale: LANG=fi_FI@euro, LC_CTYPE=fi_FI@euro (ignored: LC_ALL set to fi_FI@euro)
Versions of packages libc6 depends on:
ii libdb1-compat 2.1.3-7 The Berkeley database routines [gl
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 221850-close) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Jul 2004 08:52:07 +0000
>From q-funk@pp.fishpool.fi Thu Jul 01 01:52:07 2004
Return-path: <q-funk@pp.fishpool.fi>
Received: from seven.fishpool.fi (hal.pp.fishpool.fi) [195.197.229.220] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BfxIc-00030d-00; Thu, 01 Jul 2004 01:52:07 -0700
Received: from q-funk (helo=localhost)
by hal.pp.fishpool.fi with local-esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1BfxIb-0004hv-00
for <221850-close@bugs.debian.org>; Thu, 01 Jul 2004 11:52:05 +0300
Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2004 11:52:05 +0300 (EEST)
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Martin-=C9ric_Racine?= <q-funk@iki.fi>
X-Sender: q-funk@hal.pp.fishpool.fi
cc: 221850-close@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#221850: libc6: resolving broken since ds1-10
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] 817jtojodx.wl@omega.webmasters.gr.jp>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0407011151160.17602-100000@hal.pp.fishpool.fi>
X-Archive: encrypt
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE
Sender: Martin-Eric Racine <q-funk@pp.fishpool.fi>
Delivered-To: 221850-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_10,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
On Thu, 1 Jul 2004, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> At Fri, 12 Mar 2004 23:53:21 +0900,
> GOTO Masanori wrote:
> > At Sun, 25 Jan 2004 14:15:02 +0200 (EET),
> > Martin-=C9ric Racine wrote:
> > > > > > > > That said, I believe I upgraded it to something in the 2.3.=
2.ds1 series at
> > > > > > > > one point while still running 2.4 without obvious problems.
> > > > > > >=20
> > > > > > > IIRC 2.3.2 up to ds1-8 worked well, at least on i386 but, rig=
ht now, ds1-10 is
> > > > > > > causing chaos on both hppa, i386 and powerpc.
> > > > > >=20
> > > > > > Did you exactly confirm that ds1-10 is only problem version?
> > > > >=20
> > > > > Previous versions were OK.
> > > >=20
> > > > That's strange; the difference between ds1-9 and ds1-10 is quite a =
bit
> > > > small. I wonder it's really glibc problem. Did you upgrade other
> > > > programs at the same time?
> > >=20
> > > Nope.
> > >=20
> > > As I recall, what fixed it was using FQDN declarations e.g. with nfs =
and ssh.
> > > Still, resolving is the responsability of libc, so it clearly is what=
's wrong.
> >=20
> > Please reinstal two version ds1-8 and ds1-11, and check the behavior.
> > Are there any difference?
>=20
> Any progress this bug? If you don't have any problem, I'll close this bu=
g.
Agreed.
--=20
Martin-=C9ric Racine, ICT Consultant
http://www.iki.fi/q-funk/
Reply to: