On Mon, 2004-02-23 at 08:09, Wichert Akkerman wrote: > Previously Jeff Bailey wrote: > > Thanks for the report - it's our problem, since kerberos has been > > recompiled since and no longer provides this header. We need to > > conflict. > > Wouldn't a replace be a lot more convenient? Yes, that's right. =) Tks, Jeff Bailey -- I never know what to expect when you respond to my postings. No insult intended, you are merely a surprise :) - Carlos O'Donnell
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part