On Sat, 2004-02-21 at 20:27, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > I thought there was a reason involving licensing, but I can't find any hint > of it now. If we don't force LIBGD to no in configparms, we get the > memusage script and memusagestat binary, which are quite handy. I imagine > we'd need to create a new package for them, since having libc6-dev (is that > the appropriate place?) depend on libgd2 might be uncool, but that's not > hard to do. I've never looked at those scripts, but a quick read of the license makes it look okay. (I'll check them out when I rebuild next) libgd2-noxpm is 500k (150k could be shaved off if they compressed /usr/share/doc/libgd2-noxpm/index.html), so I don't think it's a hardship if the tool is generally useful. Tks, Jeff Bailey -- I never know what to expect when you respond to my postings. No insult intended, you are merely a surprise :) - Carlos O'Donnell
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part