Bug#227906: libc6: Failed assertion in ld.so

[Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@debian.org>]

On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 12:59:29AM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> At Thu, 15 Jan 2004 18:00:15 +0300,
> Vladimir Prus wrote:
> > Hello,
> > I have a small example where use of -static-libgcc and -Wl,-Bstatic
> > flags cause ld.so do assert.
> > 
> > I have file app.cpp containing
> >    
> >    int main() { return 0; }
> > 
> > and lib.cpp, which is empty. I compile them with
> > 
> >    g++ -o lib.so -shared -static-libgcc lib.cpp -Wl,-Bstatic
> >    g++ -o app app.cpp lib.so -static-libgcc -Wl,-Bstatic

What is this trying to accomplish?  You're going to get shared
versions of some libraries and dynamic versions of others.

> > 
> > and when I run "./app", I get:
> > 
> >     Inconsistency detected by ld.so: dl-fini.c: 66: _dl_fini: Assertion `i == _rtld_local._dl_nloaded' failed!
> 
> Strange.  Under both my kernel 2.4.21 and 2.6.0-test11 with 2.3.2.ds1-10:
> 
> 	gotom@moog:~/debian/custom/glibc/bugs/227906> ./app
> 	./app: error while loading shared libraries: lib.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory

I can't explain the inconsistency (maybe an LD_LIBRARY_PATH) but try
replacing lib.so with ./lib.so on the second g++ line to fix this
error.

> > Also, when I remove -Wl,-Bstatic from the first command line, I get the
> > following error at runtime:
> > 
> >     ld.so: Incorrectly built binary which accesses errno or h_errno directly.
> >     ld.so: See /usr/share/doc/libc6/FAQ.gz.
> > 
> > Which is strange -- since the files do not use errno in any way.
> 
> Please check your environment (ex: g++ version).
> 
> Regards,
> -- gotom
> 
> 
> -- 
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-glibc-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
> 
> 

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer