Re: Bug#223891: kdeutils_4:3.1.4-1(mips/unstable): FTBFS: SYS_* seems to be missing from bits/syscall.h ?

To: GOTO Masanori <gotom@debian.or.jp>
Cc: debian-mips@lists.debian.org, debian-glibc@lists.debian.org, 223891@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#223891: kdeutils_4:3.1.4-1(mips/unstable): FTBFS: SYS_* seems to be missing from bits/syscall.h ?
From: Guido Guenther <agx@debian.org>
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 17:16:30 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 20040115161630.GH16838@bogon.ms20.nix>
Mail-followup-to: Guido Guenther <agx@debian.org>, GOTO Masanori <gotom@debian.or.jp>, debian-mips@lists.debian.org, debian-glibc@lists.debian.org, 223891@bugs.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 81d69lcjos.wl@omega.webmasters.gr.jp>
References: <[🔎] 81isjfdcqi.wl@omega.webmasters.gr.jp> <[🔎] 20040113180718.GA1341@cyberhqz.com> <[🔎] 20040114014400.GA24460@nevyn.them.org> <[🔎] 81fzeicacq.wl@omega.webmasters.gr.jp> <[🔎] 20040115045958.GA19292@nevyn.them.org> <[🔎] 81d69lcjos.wl@omega.webmasters.gr.jp>

On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 12:31:31AM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> Guido, could you build with this patch?  I'm OK to prepare and put
> dpatch to debian-glibc cvs for this.
O.k., building...
 -- Guido

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to:

References:
- Bug#223891: kdeutils_4:3.1.4-1(mips/unstable): FTBFS: SYS_* seems to be missing from bits/syscall.h ?
  - From: GOTO Masanori <gotom@debian.or.jp>
- Bug#223891: kdeutils_4:3.1.4-1(mips/unstable): FTBFS: SYS_* seems to be missing from bits/syscall.h ?
  - From: rmurray@cyberhqz.com (Ryan Murray)
- Bug#223891: kdeutils_4:3.1.4-1(mips/unstable): FTBFS: SYS_* seems to be missing from bits/syscall.h ?
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@debian.org>
- Bug#223891: kdeutils_4:3.1.4-1(mips/unstable): FTBFS: SYS_* seems to be missing from bits/syscall.h ?
  - From: GOTO Masanori <gotom@debian.or.jp>
- Re: Bug#223891: kdeutils_4:3.1.4-1(mips/unstable): FTBFS: SYS_* seems to be missing from bits/syscall.h ?
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@debian.org>
- Re: Bug#223891: kdeutils_4:3.1.4-1(mips/unstable): FTBFS: SYS_* seems to be missing from bits/syscall.h ?
  - From: GOTO Masanori <gotom@debian.or.jp>

Prev by Date: Bug#227906: libc6: Failed assertion in ld.so
Next by Date: Re: Processed: Re: Bug#227308: lapack: too many levels of symbolic links on so
Previous by thread: Re: Bug#223891: kdeutils_4:3.1.4-1(mips/unstable): FTBFS: SYS_* seems to be missing from bits/syscall.h ?
Next by thread: Re: Bug#223891: kdeutils_4:3.1.4-1(mips/unstable): FTBFS: SYS_* seems to be missing from bits/syscall.h ?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread