[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#226688: libc6: i386: __libc_fork assertion in 2.3.2.ds1-10



On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 09:43:43AM -0500, Jeff Bailey wrote:
> On Thu, 2004-01-08 at 01:58, Mark Sheppard wrote:
> 
> > > Um.... I really, really don't want to work around that.  It's a
> > > completely broken kernel version.  What do you expect anything else
> > > that checks the kernel version string to do?
> > 
> > Fair enough if you need to parse the whole thing, but from what you've
> > said it sounds like you don't have to:
> > 
> >   The code in ld.so is supposed to choose the copy of libc in /lib for
> >   any kernel version less than 2.6.0
> > 
> > Maybe I'm missing something here, but couldn't you just check the
> > major and minor version numbers and totally ignore the revision number
> > (i.e. anything beyond the second ".")?  Or if this is something that
> > changed half way through the 2.5 kernels then you could only check the
> > revision if major == 2 && minor == 5?
> 
> No - we often have to check the revision number.  It happens
> occasionally that there's a big problem in a particular revision and we
> have to set the minimum to higher than 2.4.x
> 
> Daniel - Should I work up some hackery to maybe test to see if the
> revision number overflows the version checking magic?  We could simply
> refuse to install in that case.

Good idea.  We handle the greater than three dot-separated components
now; just check if any piece is >255.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer



Reply to: