Re: Looking at upstream CVS
At Sat, 27 Dec 2003 14:13:45 -0500,
Jeff Bailey wrote:
> We were holding off a new cvs update until the Sarge release. That
> doesn't appear to be soon, since there are still buildds that are
> offline. Also, given drepper's reluctance to ever release a new
> version, and prediction of no major changes in the near future[0], it
> seems that doing a cvs update might not only be worth doing, but also be
> relatively safe.
I also think we should keep holding off, unless sarge will not be
released over 3 or 4 months.
> Also, we have 88 dpatch files right now. It's a bit daunting.
>
> Assuming consensus, I would prepare this as 2.3.3-1 [1] for experimental
> for ia64, sparc and alpha, and do it for i386 as soon as it can be built
> again. We now have excessively good bandwidth at work, so if there's
> tests people want run like "Build the archive", I can do those now.
IMHO, making such newer version sounds good for me, but I concern we
need to maintain two trees...
Regards,
-- gotom
Reply to: