Bug#223441: Way to go for this bug?...
On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 08:26:15PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> If it's setting the stack *limit* and glibc is complaining because the
> stack *size* isn't a multiple of the page size...
>
> Why doesn't glibc round all stack limit settings to the next lower
> multiple of the page size? Sounds straightforward and safe enough to
> me. Sort of kludgy, in some ways, I admit.
What a good idea. See the bug merged with this one...
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
Reply to: