[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#224366: Relative links vs. symlinks.



On Mon, Dec 22, 2003 at 04:31:26AM -0800, Jeff Bailey wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 22, 2003 at 12:58:07AM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> 
> > > Erm, really?  That bit me so many times when working with chroots to do
> > > bug reporting - I used to run a script over it to turn them into
> > > relative symlinks.  Policy isn't terribly clear, which is why I've
> > > called it wishlist.
> > > 
> > > What have I missed?
> > 
> > Debian policy?
> > 
> > 10.5. Symbolic links
> > --------------------
> 
> 8< (snip)
> 
> Blech.  I had looked in the shared library section and hadn't seen
> anything.
> 
> I've added this back to my todo list, then.  Do you know if a
> --with-sysroot'd gcc/binutils will do the right thing with a mounted
> partition that does this?

Almost certainly not.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer



Reply to: