Re: udev and /sys mounting [was: mounting tmpfs (and sysfs) defaultly in sarge?]
- To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-glibc@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: udev and /sys mounting [was: mounting tmpfs (and sysfs) defaultly in sarge?]
- From: GOTO Masanori <gotom@debian.or.jp>
- Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 22:06:59 +0900
- Message-id: <[🔎] 81hdzytguk.wl@omega.webmasters.gr.jp>
- In-reply-to: <20031215101118.GA684@web08.manitu.net>
- References: <81r7z9tcaz.wl@omega.webmasters.gr.jp> <E1AV9GO-0002Xb-C8@mid.downhill.at.eu.org> <20031214020135.GA10910@wonderland.linux.it> <20031214122632.GA938@donald.balu5> <20031214210142.GA10303@wonderland.linux.it> <81llpeuc0w.wl@omega.webmasters.gr.jp> <20031215101118.GA684@web08.manitu.net>
At Mon, 15 Dec 2003 11:11:18 +0100,
Martin Pitt wrote:
> On 2003-12-15 10:04 +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> > >From the view point of libc6 maintainer, it's no problem to merge /sys
> > mount for /etc/init.d/devpts.sh. The name of devpts.sh should be
> > renamed to something, though. And it can be also applied for /dev/shm
> > tmpfs.
>
> That sounds reasonable. I just don't wanted it in devpts.sh.
>
> What about /etc/init.d/kernfs or mountkernfs?
OK, I would like to rename from /etc/init.d/devpts.sh to
/etc/init.d/mountfs, because (1) for example there is mountnfs which
mounts nfs (2) umountfs in initscripts un-mounts filesystems, so
"mountfs" makes a name pair. Any comments?
I take care of Marco's suggestion about initramfs.
Regards,
-- gotom
Reply to: