[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

cvs commit to linux-kernel-headers/debian by dan



Repository: linux-kernel-headers/debian
who:        dan
time:       Sat Dec 13 14:13:12 MST 2003
Log Message:
      - Add a testsuite.
  
      - Resolve a conflict between <linux/compiler.h> and <sys/cdefs.h>
        (Closes: #215337, #219664).
        - debian/patches/no-linux-compiler-h.patch
      - Let <linux/netlink.h> compile by moving some of <linux/uio.h> into
        __KERNEL__ (Closes: #215937).
        - debian/patches/linux-netlink-compilation.patch
      - Fix a -W (-Wextra) warning with the ioctl type checking macros
        (Closes: #219940, #220953).
        - debian/patches/ioctl-signedness.patch
      - Quiet #warning from <linux/list.h> for now.
        - debian/patches/linux-list-quiet-warning.patch
      - Fix conflict between <linux/time.h> and <time.h>, and other C++
        namespace cleanliness problems
        (Closes: #218438, #220232, #216921, #221438).
        - debian/patches/linux-types-and-time.patch
        - debian/patches/linux-types-ustat.h removed.
      - Also export __kernel_dev_t for util-linux/cryptoloop (Closes: 220991).
        - debian/patches/linux-types-and-time.patch
      - Remove some useless __const__ markers from byteorder headers.
        - debian/patches/byteorder-const.patch
      - Add __extension__ to several ({ }) constructs to allow them with -ansi
        (Closes: #203303).
        - debian/patches/byteorder.patch
      - Disable the contents of <asm-ia64/pal.h> in userspace (Closes: #220138).
        - debian/patches/ia64-pal.patch
      - Don't include unneeded mod_devicetable.h from linux/pci.h (Closes: #221543).
        - debian/patches/linux-pci.patch
      - Don't include buffer_head.h from linux/msdos_fs.h (Closes: #220331).
        - debian/patches/msdos-fs.patch
      - Suppress pedantic long long warnings for <linux/types.h>.
        - debian/patches/linux-types-long-long.patch
  

Files:
changed:    changelog rules



Reply to: