Bug#93810: Processed: reassign 95254 coreutils
Hi!
At Sat, 19 Apr 2003 23:04:41 -0400,
Michael Stone wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 20, 2003 at 11:30:57AM +0900, you wrote:
> >Your "prominent" is only your "feeling" or "personal opinion", what is
> >the different from the google search.
>
> 1. I think you misread. I said "may be more prominent"--I have no
> opinion on that.
Ah, sorry, it's my misread. I guess you have any insistence, so...
> 2. You didn't answer the question--what is the downside to using AEST?
One defect is that AEST is not general in Australia from the report.
If suddenly we change from EST to AEST, can you say there is no
problem? Well, to be honest, I don't know there are any more
drawbacks. But from IST example, uniqueness of timezone name is not
the absolute requirement. I guess your question is derived from
"timezone should be unique", but I think it's not really necessary
thing as Paul Eggert said.
Regards,
-- gotom
Reply to: