Bug#168189: marked as done (libc6: Consider restarting 'samba' on upgrade)
Your message dated Mon, 17 Mar 2003 18:45:40 +0900
with message-id <80smtmmim3.wl@oris.opensource.jp>
and subject line Bug#168189: libc6: Consider restarting 'samba' on upgrade
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Nov 2002 18:05:36 +0000
>From mca-debbts@grantadesign.com Thu Nov 07 12:05:35 2002
Return-path: <mca-debbts@grantadesign.com>
Received: from fw.adsl.grantadesign.com [217.169.26.42]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 189r27-0006Rz-00; Thu, 07 Nov 2002 12:05:35 -0600
Received: from troop.granta.internal ([10.0.0.15] ident=mail)
by fw.adsl.grantadesign.com with esmtp
(Cipher TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 189r25-0005aL-00
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Thu, 07 Nov 2002 18:05:33 +0000
Received: from matthew by troop.granta.internal with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 189r25-0006Rm-00
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Thu, 07 Nov 2002 18:05:33 +0000
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2002 18:05:33 +0000
From: Matthew Astley <mca-debbts@grantadesign.com>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: libc6: Consider restarting 'samba' on upgrade
Message-ID: <20021107180533.GA24250@troop.granta.internal>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.99.50
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.3 required=5.0
tests=SPAM_PHRASE_01_02,USER_AGENT,USER_AGENT_MUTT
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level:
Package: libc6
Version: 2.3.1-3
Severity: important
Hopefully straightforward: the 'samba' server broke when I upgraded
libc6, and mended again when I restarted it.
Do you wish to Restart Services? [Y/n]
Restarting services possibly affected by the upgrade:
inetd: stopping...starting...done.
cron: stopping...starting...done.
apache: stopping...starting...done.
ssh: stopping...starting...done.
Services restarted succesfully!
I believe that offering a restart of Samba at this point would help
matters, and not have bad side effects (as with restarting XDM).
<pie location="sky">Shouldn't individual packages have their own flag
for whether they need restarting on libc upgrades?</pie>
Matthew #8-)
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux troop.granta.internal 2.4.5 #1 Wed Mar 6 19:11:51 GMT 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=en_GB.ISO-8859-1, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.ISO-8859-1
Versions of packages libc6 depends on:
ii libdb1-compat 2.1.3-6 The Berkeley database routines [gl
-- no debconf information
Other:
ii samba 2.2.5-1 A LanManager like file and printer server fo
(Hmm, that's old ("if it works, don't fix it") and I can't upgrade at
the moment anyway because of libcupsys2 dependencies. I apologise if
the age of this has caused the need for the restart.)
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 168189-done) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Mar 2003 09:45:43 +0000
>From gotom@debian.or.jp Mon Mar 17 03:45:42 2003
Return-path: <gotom@debian.or.jp>
Received: from oris.opensource.jp (oris.opensource.gr.jp) [218.44.239.73] (postfix)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18urBe-0002s9-00; Mon, 17 Mar 2003 03:45:42 -0600
Received: from oris.opensource.jp (oris.opensource.jp [218.44.239.73])
by oris.opensource.gr.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 650DAC33C7; Mon, 17 Mar 2003 18:45:40 +0900 (JST)
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2003 18:45:40 +0900
Message-ID: <80smtmmim3.wl@oris.opensource.jp>
From: GOTO Masanori <gotom@debian.or.jp>
To: Matthew Astley <mca-debbts@grantadesign.com>,
168189-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#168189: libc6: Consider restarting 'samba' on upgrade
In-Reply-To: <20021107202035.GS6852@troop.granta.internal>
References: <20021107180533.GA24250@troop.granta.internal>
<20021107194109.GA18473@nisa.net>
<20021107202035.GS6852@troop.granta.internal>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.9.9 (Unchained Melody) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya)
FLIM/1.14.3 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Unebigory=F2mae?=) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.2
(i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: 168189-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=4.0
tests=IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,
USER_AGENT
version=2.44
X-Spam-Level:
At Thu, 7 Nov 2002 20:20:35 +0000,
Matthew Astley wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 07, 2002 at 11:41:09AM -0800, Jeff Bailey wrote:
>
> > Did existing connections stop working, or just new connections?
>
> Don't know, I have a 10 minute timeout (deadtime = 10) on the server
> in question, so the chances are there were no live connections.
>
> > If just new connections, does restarting samba drop those
> > connections?
>
> I believe so. Then again, I would imagine restarting inetd will also
> drop the connections, if samba is hanging off inetd (there is a
> configuration option for inetd/daemon mode).
>
> You can detect connections with smbstatus, but this will require
> messing about with grep and seems beyond the call of thingummy for
> libc6.
>
> I have to admit that I'm not familiar with details of samba restarts.
> I tend to be quite trigger-happy with killing off running samba
> processes and haven't had any problems. Perhaps it would be best to
> ask the maintainer.
glibc-2.3.1-15 is already have script restarting samba.
I sometimes restart samba with live connection, but no problem.
I close this bug.
Regards,
-- gotom
Reply to: