Bug#169789: marked as done (libc6: postinst broken: uninstallable if you upgrade from a version older than 2.2.94-1)
Your message dated Sun, 05 Jan 2003 15:32:06 +0900
with message-id <80of6w3y55.wl@oris.opensource.jp>
and subject line Bug#169789: libc6: postinst broken: uninstallable if you upgrade from a version older than 2.2.94-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Nov 2002 18:52:26 +0000
>From mnencia@timelord.mnencia.dnsalias.net Tue Nov 19 12:52:25 2002
Return-path: <mnencia@timelord.mnencia.dnsalias.net>
Received: from r-fi049-6b15.tin.it (timelord.mnencia.dnsalias.net) [62.211.213.15]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18EDU0-0007HH-00; Tue, 19 Nov 2002 12:52:24 -0600
Received: from mnencia by timelord.mnencia.dnsalias.net with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 18EDTs-0002IP-00; Tue, 19 Nov 2002 19:52:16 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Marco Nenciarini <mnencia@debian.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: libc6: postinst broken: uninstallable if you upgrade from a version
older than 2.2.94-1
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.9
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 19:52:16 +0100
Message-Id: <E18EDTs-0002IP-00@timelord.mnencia.dnsalias.net>
Sender: Marco Nenciarini <mnencia@timelord.mnencia.dnsalias.net>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0
tests=SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level:
Package: libc6
Version: 2.3.1-4
Severity: grave
Tags: patch sid
Justification: renders package unusable
if you upgrade from a version older than 2.2.94-1, postint check for
services that may need to be restarted.
In checking routine, this line raise an error:
check=$(sed 's/apache2-common/apache2/' $check)
I modified the line as:
check=$(echo $check | sed 's/apache2-common/apache2/')
and this solve the problem (on my system)...
Best Regards
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux timelord 2.4.19-k7 #1 Sun Oct 6 20:29:56 EST 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=it_IT@euro, LC_CTYPE=it_IT@euro
Versions of packages libc6 depends on:
ii libdb1-compat 2.1.3-7 The Berkeley database routines [gl
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 169789-done) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Jan 2003 06:32:09 +0000
>From gotom@debian.or.jp Sun Jan 05 00:32:08 2003
Return-path: <gotom@debian.or.jp>
Received: from oris.opensource.jp (oris.opensource.gr.jp) [218.44.239.73] (postfix)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18V4KN-0002qY-00; Sun, 05 Jan 2003 00:32:08 -0600
Received: from oris.opensource.jp (oris.opensource.jp [218.44.239.73])
by oris.opensource.gr.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E445C351C
for <169789-done@bugs.debian.org>; Sun, 5 Jan 2003 15:32:06 +0900 (JST)
Date: Sun, 05 Jan 2003 15:32:06 +0900
Message-ID: <80of6w3y55.wl@oris.opensource.jp>
From: GOTO Masanori <gotom@debian.or.jp>
To: 169789-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#169789: libc6: postinst broken: uninstallable if you upgrade from a version older than 2.2.94-1
In-Reply-To: <E18EDTs-0002IP-00@timelord.mnencia.dnsalias.net>
References: <E18EDTs-0002IP-00@timelord.mnencia.dnsalias.net>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.9.9 (Unchained Melody) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya)
FLIM/1.14.3 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Unebigory=F2mae?=) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.2
(i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: 169789-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.8 required=5.0
tests=IN_REP_TO,REFERENCES,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level:
This bug is already fixed in 2.3.1-5.
-- gotom
Reply to: