Bug#167801: marked as done (libc6 version in stable distribution (woody) is not 2.2.5 but 2.3.1)
Your message dated Thu, 02 Jan 2003 16:25:54 +0900
with message-id <80of7057y5.wl@oris.opensource.jp>
and subject line Bug#167801: Sorry, false alert due to dselect misconfiguration
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Nov 2002 23:46:48 +0000
>From schleber@bio.chemie.uni-freiburg.de Mon Nov 04 17:46:48 2002
Return-path: <schleber@bio.chemie.uni-freiburg.de>
Received: from bio4.chemie.uni-freiburg.de [132.230.31.11]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 188qvf-0005Xp-00; Mon, 04 Nov 2002 17:46:47 -0600
Received: from bio.chemie.uni-freiburg.de (natascha.chemie.uni-freiburg.de [200.200.200.53])
by bio4.chemie.uni-freiburg.de (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id AAA00491
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Tue, 5 Nov 2002 00:46:15 +0100 (MET)
Message-ID: <3DC706EF.5030707@bio.chemie.uni-freiburg.de>
Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2002 00:46:55 +0100
From: Christian Schleberger <schleber@bio.chemie.uni-freiburg.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; WinNT4.0; de-DE; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20020823 Netscape/7.0
X-Accept-Language: de-de, de
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: libc6 version in stable distribution (woody) is not 2.2.5 but 2.3.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.4 required=5.0
tests=SPAM_PHRASE_01_02,USER_AGENT,USER_AGENT_MOZILLA_UA,
X_ACCEPT_LANG
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level:
Package:libc6
Version: 2.3.1
The libc6 version in the stable (woody) ditribution of debian linux is
version 2.3.1. This version should be in the unstable path I thing.
The testing tree provides version 2.2.5.
Searching in the debian database of the stable version shows that there
should be the 2.2.5 version.
This is not the case for the german ftp-mirror site as far I can see.
I think this lead to some compiling errors I experienced.
I am using Debian GNU/Linux 3.0
Greets
Christian
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 167801-done) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Jan 2003 07:25:56 +0000
>From gotom@debian.or.jp Thu Jan 02 01:25:56 2003
Return-path: <gotom@debian.or.jp>
Received: from oris.opensource.jp (oris.opensource.gr.jp) [218.44.239.73] (postfix)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18Tzjn-0000XM-00; Thu, 02 Jan 2003 01:25:56 -0600
Received: from oris.opensource.jp (oris.opensource.jp [218.44.239.73])
by oris.opensource.gr.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 51270C351C; Thu, 2 Jan 2003 16:25:54 +0900 (JST)
Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2003 16:25:54 +0900
Message-ID: <80of7057y5.wl@oris.opensource.jp>
From: GOTO Masanori <gotom@debian.or.jp>
To: Christian Schleberger <schleber@bio.chemie.uni-freiburg.de>,
167801-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#167801: Sorry, false alert due to dselect misconfiguration
In-Reply-To: <3DCFCC53.60408@bio.chemie.uni-freiburg.de>
References: <3DCFCC53.60408@bio.chemie.uni-freiburg.de>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.9.9 (Unchained Melody) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya)
FLIM/1.14.3 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Unebigory=F2mae?=) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.2
(i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: 167801-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-10.0 required=5.0
tests=IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,SPAM_PHRASE_01_02,
USER_AGENT
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level:
At Mon, 11 Nov 2002 16:27:15 +0100,
Christian Schleberger wrote:
> Sorry, for the error message, but my dselect showed me the wrong version
> number of the libc6 package after I messed around with the apt
> configuration. Since it was very very late I didn't see that. After a
> new installation of the dist. it showed the right version 2.2.5 of libc6
> again.
You seems to get right behavior :)
I close this bug.
-- gotom
Reply to: