Bug#223441: Way to go for this bug?...
On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 08:26:15PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> Why doesn't glibc round all stack limit settings to the next lower
> multiple of the page size? Sounds straightforward and safe enough to
> me. Sort of kludgy, in some ways, I admit.
We have a patch in hand for this - I tried to merge this bug with
another one earlier today, but apparently I can't merge a libc6 bug with
a libc6.1 bug. Please see 225466.
This is on my todo list for tomorrow.