[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#219025: libc6 upgrade broke ldconfig



Package: libc6
Version: 2.3.2.ds1-9

ran an apt-get dist-upgrade which attempted to update about 30 packages and
install 1 new. Failed on libc6 with:

/var/lib/dpkg/info/libc6.postinst: line 360:  9763 Illegal instruction
ldconfig
dpkg: error processing libc6 (--configure):
 subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 132
Errors were encountered while processing:
 libc6
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)

ldconfig -v or ldconfig --help or ldconfig anything just produces an illegal
instruction. Unable to remove, install, dpkg or dselect anything now.

dpkg: error processing libc6 (--configure):
 subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 132
dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of locales:
 locales depends on glibc-2.3.2.ds1-9; however:
  Package glibc-2.3.2.ds1-9 is not installed.
  Package libc6 which provides glibc-2.3.2.ds1-9 is not configured yet.
dpkg: error processing locales (--configure):
 dependency problems - leaving unconfigured
dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of ldso:
 ldso depends on libc6 (>= 2.1.94); however:
  Package libc6 is not configured yet.
dpkg: error processing ldso (--configure):
 dependency problems - leaving unconfigured
Errors were encountered while processing:
 libc6
 locales
 ldso

--

Linux 2.2.20-idepci #1 Sat Apr 20 12:45:19 EST 2002 i686 GNU/Linux
lrwxrwxrwx    1 root     root           13 Nov  3 18:15 /lib/libc.so.6 ->
libc-2.3.2.so

sources list:
deb ftp://security.debian.org/debian-security stable/updates main contrib
non-free
deb ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian stable main contrib non-free
deb ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian unstable main contrib non-free
deb http://http.us.debian.org/debian stable main contrib non-free


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.536 / Virus Database: 331 - Release Date: 03/11/2003




Reply to: