[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#216944: marked as done (Locales doesn't like ksh)



Your message dated Tue, 21 Oct 2003 23:40:03 +0200
with message-id <20031021214003.GA2024@zobe.linuxfr.org>
and subject line Bug#216944: Locales doesn't like ksh
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Oct 2003 20:01:15 +0000
>From jch@pps.jussieu.fr Tue Oct 21 15:01:14 2003
Return-path: <jch@pps.jussieu.fr>
Received: from shiva.jussieu.fr [134.157.0.129] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1AC2gs-0008IW-00; Tue, 21 Oct 2003 15:01:14 -0500
Received: from helium.pps.jussieu.fr (helium.pps.jussieu.fr [134.157.168.2])
          by shiva.jussieu.fr (8.12.10/jtpda-5.4) with ESMTP id h9LK1C4B065687
          for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Tue, 21 Oct 2003 22:01:13 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from lanthane (lanthane.pps.jussieu.fr [134.157.168.57])
          by helium.pps.jussieu.fr (8.11.6/jtpda-5.3.2) with ESMTP id h9LK1Cl91473
          for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Tue, 21 Oct 2003 22:01:12 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from jch by lanthane with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
	id 1AC2gq-000682-00
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Tue, 21 Oct 2003 22:01:12 +0200
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Locales doesn't like ksh
From: Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@pps.jussieu.fr>
Date: 21 Oct 2003 22:01:12 +0200
Message-ID: <[🔎] tpptgq9x87.fsf@lanthane.pps.jussieu.fr>
Lines: 13
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@pps.jussieu.fr>
X-Antivirus: scanned by sophie at shiva.jussieu.fr
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0
	tests=BAYES_30,HAS_PACKAGE
	version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_21
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_21 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

Package: locales
Version: 2.3.2-7

When /bin/sh is a link to pdksh, installation of locales fails with a
message to the effect that the postinst script returned a code of 1.

I am sorry I was unable to debug this further, as dpkg doesn't seem to
provide a way to understand what's going on.

Regards,

                                        Juliusz Chroboczek


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 216944-done) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Oct 2003 21:40:13 +0000
>From barbier@linuxfr.org Tue Oct 21 16:40:04 2003
Return-path: <barbier@linuxfr.org>
Received: from zobe.linuxfr.org [212.27.33.220] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1AC4EV-0007jr-00; Tue, 21 Oct 2003 16:40:04 -0500
Received: by zobe.linuxfr.org (Postfix, from userid 1015)
	id 6B49FEF92; Tue, 21 Oct 2003 23:40:03 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 23:40:03 +0200
To: Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@pps.jussieu.fr>
Cc: 216944-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#216944: Locales doesn't like ksh
Message-ID: <20031021214003.GA2024@zobe.linuxfr.org>
References: <[🔎] tpptgq9x87.fsf@lanthane.pps.jussieu.fr> <[🔎] 20031021211127.GB26905@zobe.linuxfr.org> <[🔎] tpismifft8.fsf@helium.pps.jussieu.fr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] tpismifft8.fsf@helium.pps.jussieu.fr>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
From: barbier@linuxfr.org (Denis Barbier)
Delivered-To: 216944-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=4.0
	tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION
	version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_21
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_21 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 11:20:51PM +0200, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
> > isn't this similar to #210301?
> 
> Looks like it.
> 
> Please mark it as a dup and sorry for that.

Okay, I can confirm that 'unset foo' returns 1 with pdksh when
foo is not defined, so I am closing this bug.
Thanks for your report, anyway.

Denis



Reply to: