Hey Carlos - When submitting these upstream, will you consider adding test cases for these failures? feraiseexcept should certainly be tested somewhere. I don't know if there's a reasonable way to put in the test for the syscalls, though. If you don't have time, that's fine too. I just like to encourage people to improve testsuites whenever they can. =) Tks, Jeff Bailey On Mon, 2003-10-20 at 19:43, Carlos O'Donell wrote: > On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 07:50:05PM -0400, Carlos O'Donell wrote: > > Will produce a new patch and new testing debs. Thanks go to all the > > testers that turned up these problems. > > New debs fix reported problems: > a. Six argument syscall faiulres. > b. feraiseexcept(FE_INEXACT) doesn't raise FE_INEXACT excption. > > New patch available at: > http://www.baldric.uwo.ca/~carlos/glibc232-hppa-full-2003-10-20.dpatch > > Follow the instructions provided in the original email: > 1. Remove all previous hppa patches. > 2. Add this .dpatch as the only hppa patch. > > Upload requested :) Lets make userspace churn... > > Cheers, > Carlos. -- In the United States, there isn't a government database that hasn't been misused by the very people entrusted with keeping its information safe. - Bruce Schneier
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part