[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#214692: marked as done (libc6-dev: stdlib.h internal #includes broken/point to moved/non-existent headers)



Your message dated Tue, 7 Oct 2003 21:52:20 -0700
with message-id <20031008045220.GA5991@marge.v3.ca>
and subject line Bug#214692: apologies, this a dependency problem in GCC, not a bug in libc6-dev
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Oct 2003 03:56:02 +0000
>From xiphmont@xiph.org Tue Oct 07 22:56:01 2003
Return-path: <xiphmont@xiph.org>
Received: from h004005a8a3c2.ne.client2.attbi.com (Snotfish.xiph.org) [24.61.15.239] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1A75Qf-0004fX-00; Tue, 07 Oct 2003 22:56:01 -0500
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: xiphmont <xiphmont@xiph.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: libc6-dev: stdlib.h internal #includes broken/point to moved/non-existent
 headers
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.22
Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2003 23:56:00 -0400
X-Debbugs-Cc: xiphmont@xiph.org
Message-Id: <E1A75Qf-0004fX-00@master.debian.org>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0
	tests=HAS_PACKAGE
	version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_05
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_05 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

Package: libc6-dev
Version: 2.3.2-8
Severity: grave
Tags: sid
Justification: renders package unusable

Include files have apparently moved; apt-get upgrade tonight broke all compilati
on on the machine.  Sample g++ error output:

g++ -c -g -O allegro.cpp -o allegro.cpp.o
In file included from allegro.cpp:9:
/usr/include/stdlib.h:33:20: stddef.h: No such file or directory
In file included from allegro.cpp:9:
/usr/include/stdlib.h:137: error: syntax error before `(' token
In file included from allegro.cpp:9:
/usr/include/stdlib.h: In function `double atof(const char*)':
/usr/include/stdlib.h:378: error: `NULL' undeclared (first use this function)
/usr/include/stdlib.h:378: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only 
   once for each function it appears in.)
In file included from /usr/include/sys/types.h:31,
                 from /usr/include/stdlib.h:416,
                 from allegro.cpp:9:
/usr/include/bits/types.h:31:20: stddef.h: No such file or directory
In file included from /usr/include/stdlib.h:416,
                 from allegro.cpp:9:
/usr/include/sys/types.h:147:20: stddef.h: No such file or directory
In file included from /usr/include/sys/types.h:266,
                 from /usr/include/stdlib.h:416,
                 from allegro.cpp:9:
/usr/include/bits/pthreadtypes.h: At global scope:
/usr/include/bits/pthreadtypes.h:50: error: 'size_t' is used as a type, but is 
   not defined as a type.
/usr/include/bits/pthreadtypes.h:53: error: 'size_t' is used as a type, but is 
   not defined as a type.

Sample configure output:

checking for ANSI C header files... no
checking for sys/types.h... no
checking for sys/stat.h... no
checking for stdlib.h... no
checking for string.h... no
checking for memory.h... no
checking for strings.h... no
checking for inttypes.h... no
checking for stdint.h... no
checking for unistd.h... no
checking for size_t... no


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux Snotfish 2.4.21+preempt+lowlat #12 SMP Mon Aug 18 19:56:50 EDT 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C

Versions of packages libc6-dev depends on:
ii  libc6                         2.3.2-8    GNU C Library: Shared libraries an

-- no debconf information


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 214692-done) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Oct 2003 04:52:56 +0000
>From jbailey@nisa.net Tue Oct 07 23:52:54 2003
Return-path: <jbailey@nisa.net>
Received: from gluck.debian.org [192.25.206.10] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1A76Ji-0000cF-00; Tue, 07 Oct 2003 23:52:54 -0500
Received: from (marge.v3.ca) [216.66.20.89] 
	by gluck.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1A76Jh-0005Ya-00; Tue, 07 Oct 2003 22:52:53 -0600
Received: from marge.v3.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by marge.v3.ca (8.12.10/8.12.10/Debian-0) with ESMTP id h984qKoN007270;
	Tue, 7 Oct 2003 21:52:20 -0700
Received: (from jbailey@localhost)
	by marge.v3.ca (8.12.10/8.12.10/Debian-0) id h984qK1Z007267;
	Tue, 7 Oct 2003 21:52:20 -0700
X-Authentication-Warning: marge.v3.ca: jbailey set sender to jbailey@nisa.net using -f
Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2003 21:52:20 -0700
From: Jeff Bailey <jbailey@nisa.net>
To: Monty <xiphmont@xiph.org>, 214692-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#214692: apologies, this a dependency problem in GCC, not a bug in libc6-dev
Message-ID: <20031008045220.GA5991@marge.v3.ca>
References: <20031008043407.GA20327@lips.xiph.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20031008043407.GA20327@lips.xiph.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
X-EMSscan-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-EMSscan-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-8.966,
	required 5, AWL 0.04, BAYES_00 -4.90, USER_AGENT_MUTT -4.11)
Delivered-To: 214692-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.7 required=4.0
	tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT
	version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_05
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_05 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 12:34:07AM -0400, Monty wrote:

> My apologies; the bug turns out to be a missed package dependency
> relating to gcc, and has nothing to do with libc6-dev.

I see that you created a new bug instead of reassigning this one. 
Closing this bug then.

Tks,
Jeff Bailey



Reply to: