On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 09:27:47PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 01:38:26PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote: > > Is this an acceptable > > timeline to d-i folks for having headers that can be used for building > > busybox on ia64 and alpha (estimate 3 weeks to testing) > where are currently in a freeze state, so no critical changes for > currently unreleased architectures (anything except i386 and powerpc) is > done. I don't follow this. Are you saying that critical changes are *only* being made if they're for released architectures? In that case, how are you defining "released" architectures? There are already sarge CD images available for alpha (they were there before powerpc), but they are currently unusable *because* of this exact bug (debootstrap fails). > > or does anyone > > want to consider kludging the busybox sources to work around this > > namespace pollution problem? > nope Does this assessment change in light of Jeff's revised timeline (1 week to experimental, "soon after" to unstable, so probably a full 4 weeks to testing)? -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature