Bug#210355: tzconfig vs tzsetup: both in base

To: GOTO Masanori <gotom@debian.or.jp>
Cc: 210355@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug#210355: tzconfig vs tzsetup: both in base
From: Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org>
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 12:38:42 -0400
Message-id: <[🔎] 20030922163842.GA9768@kitenet.net>
Reply-to: Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org>, 210355@bugs.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 80fzip1io2.wl@oris.opensource.jp>
References: <[🔎] 20030910232340.GA857@kitenet.net> <[🔎] 80fzip1io2.wl@oris.opensource.jp>

GOTO Masanori wrote:
> It looks really good.  It is the future rock replacement.  BTW, one
> problem is libc6.postinst invokes tzconfig.  Should we remove tzconfig
> configuration code from libc6.postinst?

I can't say, because I've never understood why the postinst does that.

-- 
see shy jo

Attachment: pgpNa_sVp0ByF.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to:

References:
- Bug#210355: tzconfig vs tzsetup: both in base
  - From: Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org>
- Bug#210355: tzconfig vs tzsetup: both in base
  - From: GOTO Masanori <gotom@debian.or.jp>

Prev by Date: Bug#207391: latest internet upgrade
Next by Date: Bug#212224: libc6: Install glic 2.3.2-8 on my laptop has broken it.
Previous by thread: Bug#210355: tzconfig vs tzsetup: both in base
Next by thread: Bug#210400: libc6: generic log() is no longer exactly rounded (regression)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread