[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#206622: marked as done (libc.so script busted)

Your message dated Thu, 11 Sep 2003 18:36:30 +0100
with message-id <20030911173630.GA17216@riva.ucam.org>
and subject line libc.so/arm fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Aug 2003 20:10:07 +0000
>From philb@gnu.org Thu Aug 21 15:10:05 2003
Return-path: <philb@gnu.org>
Received: from pc2-cmbg4-3-cust239.cmbg.cable.ntl.com (kc.cam.armlinux.org) [] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 19pvkz-00045P-00; Thu, 21 Aug 2003 15:10:05 -0500
Received: from localhost ([])
	by kc.cam.armlinux.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
	id 19pvky-0001SD-00
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Thu, 21 Aug 2003 21:10:04 +0100
Subject: libc.so script busted
From: Philip Blundell <philb@gnu.org>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Content-Type: text/plain
Message-Id: <1061496603.821.1.camel@kc.cam.armlinux.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.3 
Date: 21 Aug 2003 21:10:04 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_17 (

Package: libc6-dev
Version: 2.3.2-2
Architecture: arm
Severity: serious

This can't be good news:

/* GNU ld script
   Use the shared library, but some functions are only in
   the static library, so try that secondarily.  */
*** BUG in libc/scripts/output-format.sed ***
GROUP ( /lib/libc.so.6 /usr/lib/libc_nonshared.a )

I guess we need to fix output-format.sed to handle this somehow.

Received: (at 206622-done) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Sep 2003 17:36:35 +0000
>From cjwatson@flatline.org.uk Thu Sep 11 12:36:33 2003
Return-path: <cjwatson@flatline.org.uk>
Received: from rhenium.btinternet.com [] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 19xVMu-0002tn-00; Thu, 11 Sep 2003 12:36:32 -0500
Received: from host81-129-36-235.in-addr.btopenworld.com ([] helo=riva.lab.dotat.at)
	by rhenium.btinternet.com with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #23)
	id 19xVMt-0001US-00
	for 206622-done@bugs.debian.org; Thu, 11 Sep 2003 18:36:31 +0100
Received: from cjwatson by riva.lab.dotat.at with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	for 206622-done@bugs.debian.org
	id 19xVMs-0004UP-00; Thu, 11 Sep 2003 18:36:30 +0100
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 18:36:30 +0100
From: Colin Watson <cjwatson@debian.org>
To: 206622-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: libc.so/arm fixed
Message-ID: <20030911173630.GA17216@riva.ucam.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Delivered-To: 206622-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.0 required=4.0
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_27 (

According to Phil, this has been fixed (or at least worked around) by
debian/patches/arm-output-format.dpatch in glibc 2.3.2-4.

18:32 < Kamion> do you mind if I close #206622 (the libc.so/arm thing,
                then)? it's still serious
18:33 < pb_> oh, whoops, I forgot about that.  no, please go ahead and
             close it.


Colin Watson                                  [cjwatson@flatline.org.uk]

Reply to: