Bug#204691: libc6: stacksize is too small
severity 204691 wishlist
thanks
At Mon, 11 Aug 2003 21:16:20 +0200,
Alexander Bussman <> wrote:
> I'm sorry that my bug report wasn't that detailed.
> Due to a hdd crash I cannot provide you with a piece of code that I had that
> could recreate this problem.
Oh, what a pity!
BTW, your mailer does not set your From: email address correctly.
> The problem is with the pthread implementation I think.
> One way this problem can be solved is to replace linuxthreads with nptl
> (Native Posix Thread Library).
> Because nptl does not have such limit.
Is it "froating stack issue"?
If so, we provide it with future libc6-i686 or libc6-nptl.
I change the severity to wishlist.
Regards,
-- gotom
> On Monday 11 August 2003 02.29, you wrote:
> > At Sat, 09 Aug 2003 22:06:14 +0200,
> >
> > Alexander Bussman wrote:
> > > Well, I don't know if it has to be closed because I know the previous
> > > version of glibc in sid worked flawless.
> >
> > So, it's not stacksize related issue, is it?
> > And what is transgaming's WineX? Is it free software?
> > At least from your report, we got limited information, and
> > I think stacksize issue is not bug.
> >
> > Regards,
> > -- gotom
> >
> > > GOTO Masanori wrote:
> > > >At Sat, 09 Aug 2003 13:49:41 +0200,
> > > >
> > > >Alexander Bussman wrote:
> > > >>Package: libc6
> > > >>Version: 2.3.2-2
> > > >>Severity: normal
> > > >>
> > > >>Some programs requires larger stacksize for example transgaming's
> > > >> WineX.
> > > >
> > > >(1) Such program is broken.
> > > >(2) You should change stacksize limit with ulimit/limit.
> > > >
> > > >I close this bug, ok?
>
Reply to: