Bug#203324: marked as done (libc6: __strtod_internal fails with illegal instruction on sparc32.)
Your message dated Sat, 09 Aug 2003 15:41:52 +0900
with message-id <[🔎] 80u18rib7z.wl@oris.opensource.jp>
and subject line default CPU target for ix86 based ports
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Jul 2003 11:51:54 +0000
>From hnh@sith.frs.linpro.no Tue Jul 29 06:51:50 2003
Return-path: <hnh@sith.frs.linpro.no>
Received: from sith.frs.linpro.no [64.28.20.155]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19hT1A-0006Fo-00; Tue, 29 Jul 2003 06:51:48 -0500
Received: from hnh by sith.frs.linpro.no with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 19hS88-0001bb-00; Tue, 29 Jul 2003 12:54:56 +0200
From: Harald Nordgard-Hansen <hnh@oflug.linux.no>
Subject: libc6: __strtod_internal fails with illegal instruction on sparc32.
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Mailer: bug 3.3.10.2
Message-Id: <E19hS88-0001bb-00@sith.frs.linpro.no>
Sender: Harald Nordgard-Hansen <hnh@sith.frs.linpro.no>
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 12:54:56 +0200
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Package: libc6
Version: 2.3.2-1
Severity: critical
The subject says most of it, on this here SS10 both python2.2 and ps fail
so far, the machine isn't all that usable at the moment...
A gdb traceback indicates that __strtod_internal is the culprit.
-Harald Nordgård-Hansen
-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Kernel Version: Linux sith 2.4.21-rc2 #1 Thu May 22 10:48:47 CEST 2003 sparc GNU/Linux
Versions of the packages libc6 depends on:
ii libdb1-compat 2.1.3-7 The Berkeley database routines [glibc 2.0/2.
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 203322-done) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Aug 2003 06:41:57 +0000
>From gotom@debian.or.jp Sat Aug 09 01:41:55 2003
Return-path: <gotom@debian.or.jp>
Received: from oris.opensource.jp (oris.opensource.gr.jp) [218.44.239.73]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19lNQH-0005EQ-00; Sat, 09 Aug 2003 01:41:53 -0500
Received: from oris.opensource.jp (oris.opensource.jp [218.44.239.73])
by oris.opensource.gr.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 51BC3C33C6; Sat, 9 Aug 2003 15:41:52 +0900 (JST)
Date: Sat, 09 Aug 2003 15:41:52 +0900
Message-ID: <[🔎] 80u18rib7z.wl@oris.opensource.jp>
From: GOTO Masanori <gotom@debian.or.jp>
To: Philip Blundell <pb@nexus.co.uk>, debian-sparc@lists.debian.org
Cc: GOTO Masanori <gotom@debian.or.jp>, debian-gcc@lists.debian.org,
jbglaw@lug-owl.de, bcollins@debian.org,
debian-glibc@lists.debian.org, 203322-done@bugs.debian.org,
203324-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: default CPU target for ix86 based ports
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] 1060346441.20517.2.camel@mill.nexus.co.uk>
References: <16176.46777.785177.447483@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
<20030806141445.GW1873@lug-owl.de>
<m3k79qhd0r.fsf@mira.informatik.hu-berlin.de>
<20030806183925.GZ1873@lug-owl.de>
<16177.28230.634867.251269@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
<20030806212219.GF15978@phunnypharm.org>
<20030807053308.GF1873@lug-owl.de>
<[🔎] 803cgcjpjf.wl@oris.opensource.jp>
<[🔎] 1060346441.20517.2.camel@mill.nexus.co.uk>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.9.9 (Unchained Melody) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya)
FLIM/1.14.3 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Unebigory=F2mae?=) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.2
(i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: 203322-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-13.5 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_01,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,
REFERENCES,REPLY_WITH_QUOTES,USER_AGENT
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
At 08 Aug 2003 13:40:42 +0100,
Philip Blundell wrote:
> On Fri, 2003-08-08 at 13:35, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> > So how to act for two bugs?:
> >
> > #203322: python2.2: Python fails with illegal instruction during postinst on sparc32
> > #203324: libc6: __strtod_internal fails with illegal instruction on sparc32.
> >
> > Keeping them as "Critical" is not acceptable for me, if you guys don't
> > provide any usable information, I simply close or downgrade.
>
> It seems fairly clear that the SPARC porters consider use of hwmul to be
> a feature, not a bug. I think we should close these two reports.
OK... now I've closed them. For SPARC soft-mul guys, please discuss
this issue, but not simply reopen this bug.
Regards,
-- gotom
Reply to: