Bug#186331: raising severity; was: busybox FTBTS problems
- To: Alastair McKinstry <mckinstry@computer.org>
- Cc: Philip Blundell <pb@nexus.co.uk>, 186331@bugs.debian.org, debian-boot@lists.debian.org, bug1@debian.org, tfheen@debian.org, andersee@debian.org
- Subject: Bug#186331: raising severity; was: busybox FTBTS problems
- From: Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org>
- Date: Sun, 3 Aug 2003 11:38:09 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20030803093809.GA28100@wavehammer.waldi.eu.org>
- Mail-followup-to: Alastair McKinstry <mckinstry@computer.org>, Philip Blundell <pb@nexus.co.uk>, 186331@bugs.debian.org, debian-boot@lists.debian.org, bug1@debian.org, tfheen@debian.org, andersee@debian.org
- Reply-to: Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org>, 186331@bugs.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 1059837570.2168.3.camel@coll>
- References: <[🔎] 1059828992.1017.29.camel@coll> <[🔎] 1059834409.2980.12.camel@kc.cam.armlinux.org> <[🔎] 1059837570.2168.3.camel@coll>
On Sat, Aug 02, 2003 at 04:19:31PM +0100, Alastair McKinstry wrote:
> > I'll take a look at the adjtimex problem. However, static binaries are
> > always going to be second-class citizens as far as glibc is concerned
> > and you should avoid them whenever possible.
> Ok, how about doing that? not building a static version of busybox on
> alpha until this bug is resolved? (and applying the known-to-work patch
> for ia64/alpha). It would get d-i building again.
reassign to libc6 as they are problems of this package. ia64 may be
fixable by a binary nmu.
bastian
--
Where there's no emotion, there's no motive for violence.
-- Spock, "Dagger of the Mind", stardate 2715.1
Attachment:
pgpFdnXkg4Nth.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Reply to: