Bug#202115: marked as done (libc6-dev: contains neither iso646.h nor stdbool.h, which are both required for both C99 and SUSv3)
Your message dated Sun, 20 Jul 2003 01:37:42 -0700
with message-id <20030720083742.GC28405@nisa.net>
and subject line Bug#202115: libc6-dev: does not contain iso646.h, which is required by SUSv3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Jul 2003 20:54:45 +0000
>From sandals@crustytoothpaste.ath.cx Sat Jul 19 15:54:02 2003
Return-path: <sandals@crustytoothpaste.ath.cx>
Received: from cs2416782-24.houston.rr.com (crustytoothpaste.ath.cx) [24.167.82.24]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19dyiQ-0003yG-00; Sat, 19 Jul 2003 15:54:02 -0500
Received: from stonewall (unknown [192.168.2.2])
by crustytoothpaste.ath.cx (Postfix) with SMTP
id D08467BC24; Sat, 19 Jul 2003 20:54:01 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by stonewall (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sat, 19 Jul 2003 20:54:01 +0000
Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2003 20:54:01 +0000
From: "Brian M. Carlson" <sandals@crustytoothpaste.ath.cx>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: libc6-dev: does not contain iso646.h, which is required by SUSv3
Message-ID: <[🔎] 20030719205401.GA6420@stonewall>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-ripemd160;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="HlL+5n6rz5pIUxbD"
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 2.19
X-Operating-System: Linux stonewall 2.4.21-2-k7
Content-Conversion: prohibited
X-Request-PGP: finger://bmc@crustytoothpaste.ath.cx
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-14.3 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_20,HAS_PACKAGE,PGP_SIGNATURE_2,USER_AGENT_MUTT
autolearn=ham version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_27
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_27 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
--HlL+5n6rz5pIUxbD
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Package: libc6-dev
Version: 2.3.1-17
Severity: normal
Tags: upstream
The Single Unix Specification Version 3 (also POSIX-2001) requires the
header <iso646.h>, which is not present. I assume it also absent
upstream, or it would have been included. It is a trivial fix; you can
see the required contents [0], which consist of 11 macros.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux stonewall 2.4.21-2-k7 #1 Sat Jul 5 03:47:02 EST 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=3DC, LC_CTYPE=3DC
Versions of packages libc6-dev depends on:
ii libc6 2.3.1-17 GNU C Library: Shared librarie=
s an
-- no debconf information
[0] http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/007904975/basedefs/iso646.h.html
--=20
Brian M. Carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.ath.cx> 0x560553e7
"Let us think the unthinkable, let us do the undoable. Let us prepare
to grapple with the ineffable itself, and see if we may not eff it
after all." --Douglas Adams
--HlL+5n6rz5pIUxbD
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Ubi libertas, ibi patria.
iQEVAwUBPxmv6eWR/8lWBVPnAQPceAf+MVdbXXPfAu9gC9rSNl9E1Lh8Bs9pBmpR
xqKH8XT0tzOq5M6sLL/h6ue8Tm6H/15H3qWWb7rWmcuSshyLxuokD5ec9zW456gK
6/kwJmx723GA9kzvgrQnMWQH1WNeSQrQa3jtO8c8eyKQVcaHgTb+ses+C3x/4PPO
DldeIYt2k3XkYQycCXhWEtnrxnzqjwXMFjgv/EmXePaUBt5u7JLtDAktzN4TiPjd
Ocd+qzF1RIuBY7Wt01r1g6lan03plb0KZUb8LlhHmPJxsuYXsx+nBWYflW4VLyB8
xAnJKY4mvnnekRlCg8Ag6j0s+GJ0U5uysDiHacACEoP0a4Qks415jg==
=AASP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--HlL+5n6rz5pIUxbD--
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 202115-done) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Jul 2003 08:40:56 +0000
>From jbailey@nisa.net Sun Jul 20 03:40:53 2003
Return-path: <jbailey@nisa.net>
Received: from delta.nisa.net [207.194.212.31]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19e9kT-0002Nn-00; Sun, 20 Jul 2003 03:40:53 -0500
Received: from delta.nisa.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by delta.nisa.net (8.12.9/8.12.9/Debian-3) with ESMTP id h6K8bhQ7001853;
Sun, 20 Jul 2003 01:37:43 -0700
Received: (from jbailey@localhost)
by delta.nisa.net (8.12.9/8.12.9/Debian-3) id h6K8bhIL001851;
Sun, 20 Jul 2003 01:37:43 -0700
X-Authentication-Warning: delta.nisa.net: jbailey set sender to jbailey@nisa.net using -f
Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2003 01:37:42 -0700
From: Jeff Bailey <jbailey@nisa.net>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@debian.org>, 202115-done@bugs.debian.org
Cc: "Brian M. Carlson" <sandals@crustytoothpaste.ath.cx>
Subject: Re: Bug#202115: libc6-dev: does not contain iso646.h, which is required by SUSv3
Message-ID: <20030720083742.GC28405@nisa.net>
References: <[🔎] 20030719205401.GA6420@stonewall> <[🔎] 20030719232554.GA6651@stonewall> <[🔎] 20030720013734.GA25130@nevyn.them.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] 20030720013734.GA25130@nevyn.them.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Delivered-To: 202115-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-16.9 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_01,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,
REFERENCES,REPLY_WITH_QUOTES,USER_AGENT_MUTT,X_AUTH_WARNING
autolearn=ham version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_27
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_27 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
On Sat, Jul 19, 2003 at 09:37:34PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> Have you tried just _using_ these headers? They are provided with GCC
> rather than with glibc, because they must be implemented using compiler
> functionality.
Exactly right, closing this bug.
--
Breathe into my hands, I'll cup them like a glass to drink from...
- Tattle Tale
Reply to: