Bug#93810: Processed: reassign 95254 coreutils
At Mon, 21 Apr 2003 16:22:58 -0400,
Michael Stone wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2003 at 12:06:47AM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> >drawbacks. But from IST example, uniqueness of timezone name is not
> >the absolute requirement. I guess your question is derived from
> >"timezone should be unique",
>
> It would solve problems, and I have yet to hear a downside. The fact
> that some timezones might not be unique doesn't seem a good argument
> against fixing those that can be.
Hey, it's only your thought. You only insist to hear my downside
point. And so? I leave these bugs alone. If you would like to
modify this, please contact appropriate lists. If not, it's totally
useless discussion.
Regards,
-- gotom
Reply to: