Bug#137020: acknowledged by developer (Bug#137020: fixed in glibc 2.3.1-15)
On Fri, Mar 28, 2003 at 22:04:26 +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> I tested as:
> #include <stdio.h>
> #include <fpu_control.h>
> unsigned int a;
> Original bug does not say "_FPU_RC_ZERO". You _have to_ send a
> test program to report BTS in the next time.
OK. But note that I did (very shortly) explain the problem in my
original bug report.
On Fri, Mar 28, 2003 at 22:19:23 +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> ... and this bug is really fixed in glibc 2.3.2-1.
I haven't seen glibc 2.3.2-1. When you say "fixed", did you test
with _FPU_RC_ZERO only or did you check the code?
In particular, the following test program would have failed too
with glibc 2.3.1:
unsigned int d;
(This is your test program where 'a' has been replaced by 'd'.)
Vincent Lefèvre <email@example.com> - Web: <http://www.vinc17.org/> - 100%
validated (X)HTML - Acorn Risc PC, Yellow Pig 17, Championnat International
des Jeux Mathématiques et Logiques, TETRHEX, etc.
Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / SPACES project at LORIA