Bug#152142: libc6: iconv -l vs. iconv -l|cat
> I suppose it's ok for iconv -l vs. iconv -l|cat to have different
> behaviors, like ls, but at least the man page should say so.
I'm sorry but I feel it's very trivial bug report.
Is this bug? No. Is this wishlist really needed? No.
Why should manpage need to write this issue?
> But all the
> "//" stuff looks like a bug.
iconv checks stdout, and if it's not standard output,
internal symbol is printed out. So "//" seems to be added.
I think this wishlist is trivial and I dislike to add it
because the exact valid reason is not existed. I would like
to close this bug, ok?