[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#166728: marked as done (Segmentation fault in libc6)

Your message dated Mon, 24 Mar 2003 17:37:19 +0900
with message-id <80k7epjh34.wl@oris.opensource.jp>
and subject line Bug#166728: Additionnal information
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Oct 2002 04:05:26 +0000
>From root@dagami.org Sun Oct 27 22:05:25 2002
Return-path: <root@dagami.org>
Received: from (hades.dagami.org) [] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 18619Y-0005FG-00; Sun, 27 Oct 2002 22:05:24 -0600
Received: from hades.dagami.org (localhost [])
	by hades.dagami.org (8.12.6/8.12.6/Debian-7) with ESMTP id g9S44qC6017560;
	Mon, 28 Oct 2002 05:04:52 +0100
Received: (from root@localhost)
	by hades.dagami.org (8.12.6/8.12.6/Debian-7) id g9S44qfV017558;
	Mon, 28 Oct 2002 05:04:52 +0100
Message-Id: <200210280404.g9S44qfV017558@hades.dagami.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: nb <nb@dagami.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: Segmentation fault in libc6
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.8
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 05:04:52 +0100
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0

Package: libc6
Version: 2.3.1-3
Severity: normal
Tags: sid

I've been using a prgram many years without problem. I have now a
segmentation fault.
strace shows this :
open("/lib/ld-linux.so.2", O_RDONLY)    = 3

before the error.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux hades 2.4.19 #1 Sat Oct 26 22:58:35 CEST 2002 i686

Versions of packages libc6 depends on:
ii  libdb1-compat                 2.1.3-7    The Berkeley database routines [gl

-- no debconf information

Received: (at 166728-done) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Mar 2003 08:37:23 +0000
>From gotom@debian.or.jp Mon Mar 24 02:37:23 2003
Return-path: <gotom@debian.or.jp>
Received: from oris.opensource.jp (oris.opensource.gr.jp) [] (postfix)
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 18xNSL-0001id-00; Mon, 24 Mar 2003 02:37:21 -0600
Received: from oris.opensource.jp (oris.opensource.jp [])
	by oris.opensource.gr.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EAE5C33C7
	for <166728-done@bugs.debian.org>; Mon, 24 Mar 2003 17:37:19 +0900 (JST)
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2003 17:37:19 +0900
Message-ID: <80k7epjh34.wl@oris.opensource.jp>
From: GOTO Masanori <gotom@debian.or.jp>
To: 166728-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#166728: Additionnal information
In-Reply-To: <80d6l38jfb.wl@oris.opensource.jp>
References: <80d6l38jfb.wl@oris.opensource.jp>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.9.9 (Unchained Melody) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya)
 FLIM/1.14.3 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Unebigory=F2mae?=) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.2
 (i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: 166728-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=4.0

At Fri, 07 Mar 2003 21:12:24 +0900,
GOTO Masanori wrote:
> > root@hades:~# file /opt/AVP/Tools/checkurl
> > /opt/AVP/Tools/checkurl: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80386, version
> > 1 (SYSV), for GNU/Linux 2.0.0, statically linked, stripped
> > 
> > root@hades:~# ldd !$
> > ldd /opt/AVP/Tools/checkurl
> >         not a dynamic executable
> > 
> > Is the problem related to statically linked programs?
> >
> > I tried gdb to have more informations but it gives nearly nothing.
> Your "checkurl" may be shell script.  Look at "checkurl".  Opening
> /lib/ld-linux.so.2 is wierd, so your binary uses tricky technics.
> BTW, it seems that this bug report is about "non-free" software.  I
> can't solve any more.  I plan to close this bug unless you show the
> relation to the current glibc.

I close this bug.

-- gotom

Reply to: