[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#185136: marked as done (no pthread man pages altough pkg description says that they are included)



Your message dated Wed, 19 Mar 2003 23:32:30 +0900
with message-id <804r5zmnpd.wl@oris.opensource.jp>
and subject line Bug#185136: no pthread man pages altough pkg description says that they are included
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Mar 2003 12:30:57 +0000
>From bawidama@users.sourceforge.net Mon Mar 17 06:30:57 2003
Return-path: <bawidama@users.sourceforge.net>
Received: from d06lmsgate-3.uk.ibm.com [195.212.29.3] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 18utlY-0000qd-00; Mon, 17 Mar 2003 06:30:56 -0600
Received: from d06relay02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay02.uk.ibm.com [9.166.84.148])
	by d06lmsgate-3.uk.ibm.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h2HCUj2n141792
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Mon, 17 Mar 2003 12:30:53 GMT
Received: from mogwai (dyn-9-152-219-69.boeblingen.de.ibm.com [9.152.219.69])
	by d06relay02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.12.8/NCO/VER6.5) with SMTP id h2HCUfC7065490
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Mon, 17 Mar 2003 12:30:42 GMT
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2003 13:30:41 +0100
From: Rainer Bawidamann <bawidama@users.sourceforge.net>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: no pthread man pages altough pkg description says that they are included
Message-Id: <[🔎] 20030317133041.2d1ce65d.bawidama@users.sourceforge.net>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.7.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-debian-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.0 required=4.0
	tests=HAS_PACKAGE,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
	version=2.44
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: glibc-doc
Version: 2.3.1-14

Package glibc-doc has the following description:

> Contains The GNU C Library Reference manual in info and html format as
> well as man pages for libpthread functions. Also included is the
> complete GNU C Library ChangeLog.

But there isn't any pthread man page in any version of glibc-doc I could
get (2.3.1-14, 2.2.5-14.3, 2.2.5-11.2).

Either the package description is wrong or the man pages are missing.

Regards, Rainer

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 185136-done) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Mar 2003 14:32:33 +0000
>From gotom@debian.or.jp Wed Mar 19 08:32:32 2003
Return-path: <gotom@debian.or.jp>
Received: from oris.opensource.jp (oris.opensource.gr.jp) [218.44.239.73] (postfix)
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 18vecK-0003d5-00; Wed, 19 Mar 2003 08:32:32 -0600
Received: from oris.opensource.jp (oris.opensource.jp [218.44.239.73])
	by oris.opensource.gr.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id D4498C33C8; Wed, 19 Mar 2003 23:32:30 +0900 (JST)
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 23:32:30 +0900
Message-ID: <804r5zmnpd.wl@oris.opensource.jp>
From: GOTO Masanori <gotom@debian.or.jp>
To: Josip Rodin <joy@srce.hr>
Cc: GOTO Masanori <gotom@debian.org>,
	Rainer Bawidamann <bawidama@users.sourceforge.net>,
	185136-done@bugs.debian.org, jbailey@nisa.net,
	debian-www@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#185136: no pthread man pages altough pkg description says that they are included
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] 20030318182113.GA9372@prvidomaci.srce.hr>
References: <[🔎] 20030317133041.2d1ce65d.bawidama@users.sourceforge.net>
	<[🔎] 80n0jum7du.wl@oris.opensource.jp>
	<[🔎] 20030318102507.445dacce.bawidama@users.sourceforge.net>
	<[🔎] 80d6kon463.wl@oris.opensource.jp>
	<[🔎] 20030318153759.GA19661@home.ouaza.com>
	<[🔎] 20030318182113.GA9372@prvidomaci.srce.hr>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.9.9 (Unchained Melody) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya)
 FLIM/1.14.3 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Unebigory=F2mae?=) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.2
 (i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Delivered-To: 185136-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=4.0
	tests=IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,
	      USER_AGENT
	version=2.44
X-Spam-Level: 

At Tue, 18 Mar 2003 19:21:13 +0100,
Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 18, 2003 at 04:37:59PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > Le Tue, Mar 18, 2003 at 11:24:36PM +0900, GOTO Masanori =E9crivait:
> > > I get a following bug report: Bug#185136.  This bug report says "the
> > > list of files in glibc-doc 2.3.1-14" via packages.debian.org web
> > > page does not show /usr/share/man/man3/* pthread manpages.  See:
> > >=20
> > > http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_contents.pl?searchmode=3Dfi=
lelist&word=3Dglibc-doc&version=3Dunstable
> > >=20
> > > Actually glibc-doc 2.3.1-14 has such manpages.
> > >=20
> > > 	gotom@celesta:~> dpkg -L glibc-doc | grep /usr/share/man/man3/pthread
> > > 	/usr/share/man/man3/pthread_cancel.3.gz
> > [...]
> > > 	/usr/share/man/man3/pthread_key_delete.3.gz
> > > 	/usr/share/man/man3/pthread_setspecific.3.gz
> > >=20
> > > Is it packages.debian.org problem?  I don't know where I should send
> > > this report to, so I mail you.  Could you enlighten me?
>=20
> Yes, the script has a bug in that it sometimes doesn't show the link to t=
he
> last page. In this case, the fifth page isn't displayed.
>=20
> I thought this was filed already, but I can't find it anywhere... can Rai=
ner
> please file another bug report, on the "www.debian.org" pseudo-package?

Thanks to Rainer Bawidamann, he submits another report: #185454
(package file list shown by packages.debian.org sometimes incomplete).

I close this bug.

Regards,
-- gotom



Reply to: