Bug#184565: libc0.3: missing shm* functions (from <sys/shm.h>)

[GOTO Masanori <gotom@debian.or.jp>]

reassign 184565 hurd
thanks

At Sun, 16 Mar 2003 10:49:02 +0100,
Robert Millan wrote:
> 
> On Sat, Mar 15, 2003 at 11:51:41PM -0800, Jeff Bailey wrote:
> > 
> > > Well, there are a lot of reasons - one is to support them needs not
> > > only glibc but also hurd design.  glibc BTS is for glibc, not hurd.  I
> > > feel it's difficult to implement them with only glibc modification
> > > from looking at the hurd lists archive.  This is request for hurd
> > > itself.
> 
> then it might need reassigning, but this doesn't affect the severity
> (note the lack of this feature breaks other packages)

OK, I reassign to hurd.  Reassigning to hurd related core package is
better approach to fix this issue.  

Note that there are some lacks of feature even on linux - like new
posix functions or so.  Such some functions need to implement into
kernel in first.

Hurd is not official release architecture - it can break other
packages and it's not critical issue.

> > I concur that this is wishlist - It's not the Debian glibc maintainers
> > jobs to write hurd-i386 functionality (or any other ports functionality
> > - linux included)
> 
> the Debian glibc maintainers are volunteers who just fix what they like to
> fix, but the bug is there for anyone to send a patch. the severity means
> not any obligation or whatever.
> 
> anyway, my bug is pretty noticeable as a wishlist in libc0.3's list with
> only 4 entries, so i don't care much.

hurd wishlist has only 2 entries (plus this), so we don't miss.

Regards,
-- gotom