[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#184705: marked as done (libc6: conflicts with wine)



Your message dated Sun, 16 Mar 2003 01:05:34 +0900
with message-id <80d6ksobsh.wl@oris.opensource.jp>
and subject line Bug#184705: wine in testing is recent enough
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Mar 2003 08:03:40 +0000
>From ssb22@cam.ac.uk Fri Mar 14 02:03:39 2003
Return-path: <ssb22@cam.ac.uk>
Received: from rose.csi.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.13] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 18tkAF-0002eM-00; Fri, 14 Mar 2003 02:03:39 -0600
Received: from ssb22.joh.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.142.162] ident=8)
	by rose.csi.cam.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.12)
	id 18tkAD-0000MK-00; Fri, 14 Mar 2003 08:03:37 +0000
Received: from ssb22 by ssb22.joh.cam.ac.uk with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
	id 18tkAD-0000Al-00; Fri, 14 Mar 2003 08:03:37 +0000
From: "Silas S. Brown" <ssb22@cam.ac.uk>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: libc6: conflicts with wine
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2003 08:03:37 +0000
Message-Id: <[🔎] E18tkAD-0000Al-00@ssb22.joh.cam.ac.uk>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=4.0
	tests=FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,HAS_PACKAGE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
	version=2.44
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: libc6
Version: 2.2.5-14.3
Severity: normal

apt-get insists on removing 'wine' when upgrading 'libc6'

... and it has to upgrade 'libc6' otherwise it won't upgrade
'file' according to the recent security advisory.

this is in addition to the bug that has already been
reported about PHP (it conflicts with php4 (< 4:4.2.3-5) but
only version 4:4.1.2-6 is available in testing - is this a
bug in the automatic program that creates testing and is
supposed to make sure all the dependencies are OK?)

-- System Information
Debian Release: stable/testing
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux ssb22 2.4.20 #4 Thu Feb 13 15:22:29 GMT 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=en_GB, LC_CTYPE=en_GB

Versions of packages libc6 depends on:
ii  libdb1-compat                 2.1.3-7    The Berkeley database routines [gl


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 184705-done) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Mar 2003 16:05:36 +0000
>From gotom@debian.or.jp Sat Mar 15 10:05:36 2003
Return-path: <gotom@debian.or.jp>
Received: from oris.opensource.jp (oris.opensource.gr.jp) [218.44.239.73] (postfix)
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 18uEAB-0000Eo-00; Sat, 15 Mar 2003 10:05:35 -0600
Received: from oris.opensource.jp (oris.opensource.jp [218.44.239.73])
	by oris.opensource.gr.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 2E5EFC33C8; Sun, 16 Mar 2003 01:05:34 +0900 (JST)
Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2003 01:05:34 +0900
Message-ID: <80d6ksobsh.wl@oris.opensource.jp>
From: GOTO Masanori <gotom@debian.or.jp>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@fs.tum.de>, 184705-done@bugs.debian.org
Cc: "Silas S. Brown" <ssb22@cam.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: Bug#184705: wine in testing is recent enough
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] 20030314095900.GJ16212@fs.tum.de>
References: <[🔎] 20030314092650.GI16212@fs.tum.de>
	<15985.42043.895208.353067@ssb22.joh.cam.ac.uk>
	<[🔎] 20030314095900.GJ16212@fs.tum.de>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.9.9 (Unchained Melody) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya)
 FLIM/1.14.3 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Unebigory=F2mae?=) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.2
 (i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: 184705-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.1 required=4.0
	tests=IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,SPAM_PHRASE_01_02,
	      USER_AGENT
	version=2.44
X-Spam-Level: 

At Fri, 14 Mar 2003 10:59:01 +0100,
Adrian Bunk wrote:
> 
> On Fri, Mar 14, 2003 at 09:43:23AM +0000, Silas S. Brown wrote:
> 
> > Hi,
> 
> Hi Silas,
> 
> > Adrian Bunk writes:
> > > Are you using apt pinning?
> > 
> > I'm holding back wine to version 0.0.20001026-2 because it's
> > the only version that works with the Windows application I
> > have to run.  Newer versions crash.  And since that version
> > isn't available anymore, I daren't risk upgrading because I
> > won't be able to roll back the upgrade.
> 
> It's pretty simple:
> 
> wine (<< 0.0.20021007-1) _DOES NOT WORK_ with libc6 2.3.1 installed 
> (Wine wrongly used an internal glibc symbol that is no longer available 
> in glibc 2.3).
> 
> You have to choose whether you want to keep the old Wine or install the 
> new libc6 packages.
> 
> I suggest to the libc6 maintainers to close this bug.

Thanks.  I close this bug.

Regards,
-- gotom




Reply to: