Bug#184048: [m68k] binutils testsuite failures built in a glibc-2.3.1 environment
On Sun, Mar 09, 2003 at 09:24:50AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> GOTO Masanori writes:
> > At Sun, 9 Mar 2003 08:26:52 +0100,
> > Matthias Klose wrote:
> > >
> > > Package: libc6-dev
> > > Version: 2.3.1
> > > Severity: grave
> > >
> > > Attached is a diff of a binutils built in unstable with gcc-2.95 and
> > > one built on yesterday's testing (still glibc-2.2.5).
> >
> > Is this diff means as follows?
> >
> > - is gcc-2.95 + glibc 2.2 (2003-03-07 crest unstable environment)
> > + is gcc-2.95 + glibc 2.3 (2003-03-07 crest testing environment)
>
> yes, the test failures are seen with the 3.2 environment.
That's not what GOTO said though - could you tell us exactly what tools
are involved in each of those logs?
>
> > And are other libraries totally same version? Which version do you say?
>
> which other libraries does binutils depend on, which should differ?
>
> > > Although I cannot prove that other build depedencies of binutils are
> > > the cause of this failures, I start with glibc as the moist obvious
> > > one ...
> >
> > So why do you file this bug as "grave"? Does binutils cause any
> > problems?
>
> at least so many problems, that the buildd's all have the .16 version
> installed, not .18.
>
> > What do you want for us? Why don't you contact to binutils
> > maintainer?
>
> I did. Currently no response.
>
> > The reason I request you more information is: building on m68k is too
> > slow, so providing the information saves our limited time.
>
> so what do you want to know more? You have access to crest as well.
>
> Matthias
>
>
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-glibc-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
>
>
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
Reply to: