[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#167564: why?



At Thu, 27 Feb 2003 16:26:23 -0800,
Cardenas wrote:
> Why is a segfault related to glibc a minor bug? We need to understand
> better why this program is segfaulting before we can understand
> whether or not its going to affect other apps, don't we?

You investigate it.  From this bug report we don't find any libc6
fault.  There are only doubts for libc6.  Obvious what is the problem.
In addition, we need non-free data to run Quake.  At least I don't
have any interests for such software.

Reassigning it back to quake2 is better than keeping it on libc6.

> The setup program seems to have failed on x86/glibc-2.1

Is Quake2 designed for glibc-2.1?

Regards,
-- gotom



Reply to: