[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#178217: Patch



On Fri, Jan 24, 2003 at 04:22:37PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 24, 2003 at 11:31:19AM -0700, LaMont Jones wrote:
> > tags 178217 + patch
> > --
> > Since this has broken the buildd for hppa, I plan to NMU with the patch
> > below in a few hours.
> Hello?  You could at least watch the debian-glibc list before claiming
> you're going to NMU glibc.

Okay, yellow card to drow.

No telling people not to NMU, then leaving the bug unfixed for a week.

Do you guys need more people helping you on glibc, help on different
projects so you can spend more time on glibc, more prodding, more praise,
or what? libc6 has been sitting around with random silly RC bugs for
months, for no good reason. 

Both #178217 and #178645 have some sort of patch, why have they not at
least been applied and uploaded to fix the obvious parts of the problems?

It's much easier for me to say "okay, I can accept these problems, we
really need to move forward" if the problems that we have known fixes
for are fixed. Please help?

Cheers,
aj

-- 
Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.

    ``Australian Linux Lovefest Heads West''
                   -- linux.conf.au, Perth W.A., 22nd-25th January 2003

Attachment: pgpW1KwW5DvEe.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: