Re: glibc 2.3.1 status
At Fri, 10 Jan 2003 18:23:32 -0500,
Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 10, 2003 at 05:02:55PM -0600, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > So, it looks like the arm problem's been worked out, thanks to Phil
> > Blundell. You've still got problems with at least:
> > * #175511: threaded errno broken on alpha, fix in CVS
Thanks Phil and Daniel :)
BTW, I would like to know how to solve arm problem. Is it buildd
issue?
> > * #175526: glibc 2.3 breaks gcc 3.2 tests on m68k
> > * #175529: re_compile_pattern broken
#175526 is now under building and checking. I was surprised that
gcc-3.2 could not build with debian gcc-3.2 latest on m68k. Phil
suggested me some hints (use gcc-2.95, or -O), so I'm trying its test.
m68k is too slow to build, it's needed more time.
I guess #175529 is related with another regex (mutt error) problem.
Is Someone tackling this issue? I plan to contact this report to
regex upstream author Hasegawa-san.
> > It would be good to have an update with just these fixes this weekend
> > or so.
>
> Sadly, we don't know what causes those last two, so fixes this weekend
> seem unlikely.
Well, me too. BTW, is this weekend appropriate? Due to gcc-3.2
transition is under going, next weekend is more suitable even if we
fix all bugs?
Regards,
-- gotom
Reply to: