Bug#168234: marked as done (libc6: Package doesn't try to restart services on downgrade)
Your message dated Thu, 02 Jan 2003 16:13:23 +0900
with message-id <80ptrg58j0.wl@oris.opensource.jp>
and subject line Bug#168234: libc6: Package doesn't try to restart services on downgrade
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Nov 2002 00:57:27 +0000
>From mfedyk@matchmail.com Thu Nov 07 18:57:26 2002
Return-path: <mfedyk@matchmail.com>
Received: from adsl-63-194-239-202.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net (mmp-linux.matchmail.com) [63.194.239.202]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 189xSg-00018T-00; Thu, 07 Nov 2002 18:57:26 -0600
Received: from [10.0.0.122] (helo=mis-mike-wstn)
by mmp-linux.matchmail.com with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 189xSC-0003pI-00; Thu, 07 Nov 2002 16:56:56 -0800
Received: from mfedyk by mis-mike-wstn with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 189xSB-0001wo-00; Thu, 07 Nov 2002 16:56:55 -0800
From: Mike Fedyk <mfedyk@matchmail.com>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: libc6: Package doesn't try to restart services on downgrade
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50
Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2002 16:56:54 -0800
Message-Id: <E189xSB-0001wo-00@mis-mike-wstn>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0
tests=SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level:
Package: libc6
Version: 2.2.5-14.3
Severity: normal
I recently upgraded to libc6 2.3.1-3, and when downgrading back to
2.2.5-14.3 it didn't ask to restart my services like it did on the upgrade.
-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux mis-mike-wstn 2.4.19-klips196-om196-openmosix #1 SMP Mon Oct 21 14:44:18 PDT 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
Versions of packages libc6 depends on:
ii libdb1-compat 2.1.3-7 The Berkeley database routines [gl
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 168234-done) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Jan 2003 07:13:26 +0000
>From gotom@debian.or.jp Thu Jan 02 01:13:25 2003
Return-path: <gotom@debian.or.jp>
Received: from oris.opensource.jp (oris.opensource.gr.jp) [218.44.239.73] (postfix)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18TzXh-0000Ez-00; Thu, 02 Jan 2003 01:13:25 -0600
Received: from oris.opensource.jp (oris.opensource.jp [218.44.239.73])
by oris.opensource.gr.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP
id EB7AAC351C; Thu, 2 Jan 2003 16:13:23 +0900 (JST)
Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2003 16:13:23 +0900
Message-ID: <80ptrg58j0.wl@oris.opensource.jp>
From: GOTO Masanori <gotom@debian.or.jp>
To: Mike Fedyk <mfedyk@matchmail.com>, 168234-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#168234: libc6: Package doesn't try to restart services on downgrade
In-Reply-To: <E189xSB-0001wo-00@mis-mike-wstn>
References: <E189xSB-0001wo-00@mis-mike-wstn>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.9.9 (Unchained Melody) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya)
FLIM/1.14.3 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Unebigory=F2mae?=) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.2
(i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: 168234-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-10.0 required=5.0
tests=IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,SPAM_PHRASE_01_02,
USER_AGENT
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level:
At Thu, 07 Nov 2002 16:56:54 -0800,
Mike Fedyk wrote:
> I recently upgraded to libc6 2.3.1-3, and when downgrading back to
> 2.2.5-14.3 it didn't ask to restart my services like it did on the upgrade.
Why is this needed?
I don't think it's really needed. In addition, 2.2.5-14.3 is older
than 2.3.1-*, so we have to add such hook in 2.3.1-* postrm. Do you
want to restart each services when you upgrade your glibc 2.3.1-*?
It's too verbose.
I'm sorry that I reject this proposal, and I close this bug.
-- gotom
Reply to: