[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#117680: [PATCH]



tags 117680 + patch
thanks

Hi, does the attached patch qualify as a fix for this bug? :-)  Personally
I don't see a need for ispell'ing C header files. (Doing an ispell on C
*strings* in a file might be a different story, because users may actually
see that stuff. But comments? IMNSHO, it's a waste of time. Especially in
system header files, which are already properly documented in the info
pages and the manpages.)

So I propose just applying the attached patch and closing this bug.
Thanks!


T

-- 
Mediocrity has been pushed to extremes.
--- argp/argp.h.ORIG	2002-12-30 09:08:17.000000000 -0500
+++ argp/argp.h	2002-12-30 09:10:28.000000000 -0500
@@ -96,7 +96,7 @@
    is set, then the option NAME field is displayed unmodified (e.g., no `--'
    prefix is added) at the left-margin (where a *short* option would normally
    be displayed), and the documentation string in the normal place.  For
-   purposes of sorting, any leading whitespace and puncuation is ignored,
+   purposes of sorting, any leading whitespace and punctuation is ignored,
    except that if the first non-whitespace character is not `-', this entry
    is displayed after all options (and OPTION_DOC entries with a leading `-')
    in the same group.  */

Reply to: