[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#31664: Bug should be closed?



At Thu, 26 Dec 2002 22:25:33 -0500,
H. S. Teoh <hsteoh@quickfur.ath.cx> wrote:
> 
> Jeff Bailey wrote:
> > The original bug seems to be for manpages not correctly documenting
> > strsignal needs _GNU_SOURCE defined.  That appears to now be
> > corrected.
> 
> Confirmed.

It's OK for me.

> > Is there still a bug here?
> 
> IMHO, this bug should be closed. The other issues raised seems to be
> fairly unanimously declined by various people who commented. The only open
> question seems to be whether autoconf should detect if strsignal needs
> _GNU_SOURCE. If glibc maintainers feel this still needs to be addressed,
> this bug should be reassigned to autoconf.

There are many GNU libc specific functions, they also needs
_GNU_SOURCE. I don't know autoconf in detail, so I can't decide 
it should be needed to check strsignal().

BTW, autoconf has macro AC_GNU_SOURCE, programmer should use it?

 - Macro: AC_GNU_SOURCE
     If using the GNU C library, define `_GNU_SOURCE'.  Allows the use
     of some GNU functions.  Should be called before any macros that
     run the C compiler.

-- gotom



Reply to: