Re: Bug#159899: libc6: sem_wait is not interrupted by signals, asrequired by SuS
At Fri, 6 Sep 2002 19:41:05 -0400 (EDT),
Jack Howarth wrote:
> Ulrich declines on this one for glibc 2.3. His reponse is...
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Did anybody actually read the standard? The return after interrupt is a
> 'may' error. The implementation is correct.
In addition, posix semaphore facility has not fully implemented yet.
I think it's OK to close this bug.
-- gotom
Reply to: