On Sun, 2002-05-26 at 08:07, Andreas Jaeger wrote: > Oliver Elphick <olly@lfix.co.uk> writes: > > > It seems that Red Hat's latest glibc has introduced a strict > > interpretation of the ISO C mktime() definition, such that dates before > > 1970 are now considered to be out of range. This has caused breakage of > > any application that relies on the old behaviour, such as PostgreSQL. > > Please get the facts right: The glibc CVS version has such a change in The facts are what I wanted to discover. > it - and Red Hat used as their glibc a version that has this change > incorporated. The change will be in the next official glibc release > and has been discussed on the glibc lists, > > Andreas > > > It is also the case that neither Debian's nor Suse's glibc show this > > change; nor is it mentioned in their changelogs.. > > > > Do you know why this change has occurred only in Red Hat's version? Are > > the distributions' version numbers out of sync? > > > > A small program for testing is attached. On Debian's latest libc6 it > > reports a timestamp of -31712400, but on latest Red Hat it apparently > > reports -1. I think you are saying that Red Hat's glibc 2.2.5-3x is not 2.2.5 but a cvs version beyond 2.2.5. Is that right? No comment is necessary on the sense or usefulness of the actual change... -- Oliver Elphick Oliver.Elphick@lfix.co.uk Isle of Wight http://www.lfix.co.uk/oliver GPG: 1024D/3E1D0C1C: CA12 09E0 E8D5 8870 5839 932A 614D 4C34 3E1D 0C1C "Let nothing be done through strife or vainglory; but in lowliness of mind let each esteem other better than themselves." Philippians 2:3
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part