Re: bugs triage?
At Mon, 2 Dec 2002 14:43:27 +1000,
Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 30, 2002 at 02:16:46PM -0800, Randolph Chung wrote:
> > > > * #167794: Wrong Pre-Depends
> > > > Package: libc6; Severity: critical; Reported by: Martin Schulze <joey@infodrom.org>; 25 days old.
> > > > Looks like this might be a problem in the buildd setup? There's not
> > > > enough information in the bug to say, and I'm not sure why this is
> > > > assigned to glibc.
> > > No, it's not buildd setup; it's the result of a glibc bug (#165456).
> > that bug is closed... so is this not a problem anymore?
>
> It remains a problem until all the miscompiled packages get reuploaded.
> A version of sendmail broken in this manner made it into testing, causing
> further problems. (This can be fixed by a source upload targetting at
> testing and going into testing-proposed-updates, for reference)
Umm, but from glibc point of view, it was already fixed.
So I've closed this bug. (To reopen this bug is ok if you want).
Sending bug reports to such broken packages is more practical, don't you?
-- gotom
Reply to: