Bug#167608: ldd: ./: No such file or directory

To: Clint Adams <schizo@debian.org>, 167608@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug#167608: ldd: ./: No such file or directory
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2002 19:54:04 +1100
Message-id: <[🔎] E188zTI-0004IL-00@gondolin.me.apana.org.au>
Reply-to: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>, 167608@bugs.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20021104155226.GA7689@dman.com>

Clint Adams <schizo@debian.org> wrote:
> 
> I do imagine that the explicit specification is more portable though.

According to the autoconf portability document, "for a do" is more
portable since some shells don't do "$@" correctly.
-- 
Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 is out! ( http://www.debian.org/ )
Email:  Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Bug#167608: ldd: ./: No such file or directory
  - From: Clint Adams <schizo@debian.org>

References:
- Bug#167608: ldd: ./: No such file or directory
  - From: Clint Adams <schizo@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Bug#151225: marked as done (undefined symbol sqrtl in libstlport4.5 on PPC with gcc-3.1)
Next by Date: Bug#153762: (no subject)
Previous by thread: Bug#167608: ldd: ./: No such file or directory
Next by thread: Bug#167608: ldd: ./: No such file or directory
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread