Bug#166762: marked as done (package libc6-dev : exp10 exp2 round missing im libm.h)
Your message dated Tue, 05 Nov 2002 11:42:10 +0900
with message-id <80k7jsagal.wl@oris.opensource.jp>
and subject line Bug#166762: package libc6-dev : exp10 exp2 round missing im libm.h
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Oct 2002 10:45:44 +0000
>From willem_vermin@sara.nl Mon Oct 28 04:45:43 2002
Return-path: <willem_vermin@sara.nl>
Received: from mta.sara.nl [145.100.16.144]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 1867Ox-0005om-00; Mon, 28 Oct 2002 04:45:43 -0600
Received: from mailgate.sara.nl (mailgate.sara.nl [145.100.16.130])
by mta.sara.nl (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id g9SAhVK00251;
Mon, 28 Oct 2002 11:43:31 +0100 (MET)
Received: from localhost (willem@localhost)
by mailgate.sara.nl (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id LAA22030;
Mon, 28 Oct 2002 11:45:40 +0100 (MET)
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 11:45:37 +0100 (MET)
From: Willem Vermin <willem_vermin@sara.nl>
To: <submit@bugs.debian.org>
cc: Jaap Dijkshoorn <jaap@sara.nl>
Subject: package libc6-dev : exp10 exp2 round missing im libm.h
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.33.0210281142001.21451-100000@mailgate.sara.nl>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.2 required=5.0
tests=SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT_PINE
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level:
Package: libc6-dev
It appears that definitions for 'exp10', 'exp2' and 'round' are
missing in /usr/include/math.h
Debian version: 3.0, intel
Regards,
Willem Vermin
Willem Vermin tel (31)20 5923000
SARA, Kruislaan 415 fax (31)20 6683167
1098 SJ Amsterdam willem@sara.nl
Nederland
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 166762-done) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Nov 2002 02:42:12 +0000
>From gotom@debian.or.jp Mon Nov 04 20:42:11 2002
Return-path: <gotom@debian.or.jp>
Received: from oris.opensource.jp (oris.opensource.gr.jp) [218.44.239.73] ([hJEkX+6tWBWPrRIO9eZUdaZf/xlb2qgF])
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 188tfP-0007ue-00; Mon, 04 Nov 2002 20:42:11 -0600
Received: from oris.opensource.jp (oris.opensource.jp [218.44.239.73])
by oris.opensource.gr.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 2FC1AC33C6; Tue, 5 Nov 2002 11:42:10 +0900 (JST)
Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2002 11:42:10 +0900
Message-ID: <80k7jsagal.wl@oris.opensource.jp>
From: GOTO Masanori <gotom@debian.or.jp>
To: Jeff Bailey <jbailey@nisa.net>, 166762-done@bugs.debian.org
Cc: Willem Vermin <willem_vermin@sara.nl>,
Jaap Dijkshoorn <jaap@sara.nl>
Subject: Re: Bug#166762: package libc6-dev : exp10 exp2 round missing im libm.h
In-Reply-To: <20021028145615.GB10830@nisa.net>
References: <Pine.GSO.4.33.0210281142001.21451-100000@mailgate.sara.nl>
<20021028145615.GB10830@nisa.net>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.9.9 (Unchained Melody) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya)
FLIM/1.14.3 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Unebigory=F2mae?=) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.2
(i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Delivered-To: 166762-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-9.3 required=5.0
tests=IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,
USER_AGENT
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level:
At Mon, 28 Oct 2002 06:56:15 -0800,
Jeff Bailey wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 11:45:37AM +0100, Willem Vermin wrote:
>=20
> > It appears that definitions for 'exp10', 'exp2' and 'round' are
> > missing in /usr/include/math.h
=46rom SUSv3 and C99, exp2() and round() should be in tgmath.h.
exp10() is not defined.
> When submitting these types of bugs, please include why you think
> there should be a definition for them. Otherwise I have to do the work
> to look in standards to figure out if this is a good idea or not. That
> tends to mean that it will collect dust for a long time. =3D)
>=20
> Particularily good reasons are: "Posix standard X, section Y.Z", or=20
> "The manual says it's there, but it's not". =20
That's right. I lose minutes to check this bug :-(
Regards,
-- gotom
Reply to: