[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#165760: Processed: reassign



[Cc to BTS]

At Wed, 23 Oct 2002 22:58:07 +0800,
$(0-nKgTJ(B <imacat@mail.imacat.idv.tw> wrote:
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Your 'From:' field uses raw BIG5? Using MIME encode is better...

> > Why is this bug assigned for libc6? Which version is libc6 ?
> 
>     libc6 is glibc.  I have seen the same bug before when I was working
> on Red Hat 7.3 for another server.  I searched the google and found a
> bug report at the Red Hat's bugzilla, on glibc:
> 
>       http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65612
> 
>     I recently switched my own servers from Red Hat to Debian (due to
> the Red Hat KDE Taiwan national flag event), and I found the same
> problem.  I was quickly reminded that this may be a bug of glibc in
> Debian, too. This bug is solved as soon as I recompiled and installed
> glibc myself. It's a little hard to do this, though.

Thank you for pointing to me. It's glibc bug as you said. 

>     Besides, I found this bug while I was compiling perl 5.8.0 and doing
> "make test".  perl's "make test" fails at t/op/int since it tests for (3
> % -10).  I know few people checks the failure of "make test" seriously,
> but I just happen to be the one.

"make test" is only test, so I don't concern. Woody is already
released, and this bug is not critical bug, so I'm afraid it's not fix
for woody... I classify this bug as 'Tags: woody', and it's fixed if
sarge will be released.

> > BTW, this bug is appeared on woody (2.2.5-15), but
> > not on sid (2.3.1-3).
> 
>     That's great. ^_*'  But sid is still unstable, so I can't put it on
> production servers. ^^;  My own new glibc works perfectly now. ^_*'

Well, currently sid (2.3.1-3) is still under development, 
Putting it on production system is adventure (^_^;

Regards,
-- gotom




Reply to: