Re: Bug#165881: telnetd aborts when EAGAIN returned from writev
reassign 165881 libc6
quit
On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 05:57:19AM -0600, John Marvin wrote:
>
> However, the code checks for EWOULDBLOCK, not EAGAIN. Other Unix OS's
> might use EWOULDBLOCK in this case, but Linux uses EAGAIN. You should
> not get an EWOULDBLOCK from a write or writev call (I think Linux only
> uses EWOULDBLOCK for file locking).
Looks like a bug in glibc since it's meant to make the two symbols
identical:
- Macro: int EAGAIN
Resource temporarily unavailable; the call might work if you try
again later. The macro `EWOULDBLOCK' is another name for `EAGAIN';
they are always the same in the GNU C library.
Why does parisc differentiate the two anyway? Every other Linux
architecture treats them the same way.
--
Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 is out! ( http://www.debian.org/ )
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
Reply to: